• Binzy_Boi@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Firefox has been doing a lot of caving in as of late. Librewolf is a solid browser, just gotta adjust to setting a whitelist for cookies but it’s smooth sailing after the fact.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        They made a shitty change to their TOS regarding sharing user data with advertisers, then backtracked (appropriately, imho). It’s the same issue as always - Firefox costs Mozilla millions of dollars to develop and maintain, and it’s entirely funded by advertising companies. I personally think Mozilla does a pretty good job of balancing interests, but that is a long term problematic relationship for privacy respecting software. I don’t think any of the forks solve that problem, as they are still dependent on all of Mozilla’s development money to keep going, and Chrome based browsers are even worse. Modern browsers are just too damned expensive! Anyway, the drama: https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/03/mozilla-rewrites-firefoxs-terms-of-use-after-user-backlash/?guccounter=1

        • zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 days ago

          Chrome based browsers are even worse

          IMHO “even worse” it not accurate here. Chrome based browsers are much worse, and they are always developing new technologies to exploit users’ privacy for profit.

          I think the only viable option is to leave Chrome ASAP (for everyone). If one is unsatisfied with Firefox’s policy (we should!), then to choose a non-Chromium browser carefully

          • johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Google funds Mozilla quite a bit. It would be good to decouple them but that would require a major change to how they are funded.

          • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’m not sure you are vehemently agreeing with me, or somehow arguing the semantics that “even worse” and “much worse” mean something substantially different.

            Indeed, see the context - I’m referring to the fact that Firefox is nearly 100% funded by advertisers, but separated by an arms-reach organization. Chrome is precisely 100% funded by advertisers, and under the complete control of an advertising company. Chrome is clearly worse, but Firefox is long-term problematic because that advertising money is going to whittle away at that separation eventually.

            • zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              I apology for my words causing confusion. I’m not arguing “even worse” vs “much worse”. I just want to emphasize Chrome is terrible at privacy.

          • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think that Mozilla’s Gecko is the only real alternative to Chrome/Safari’s Blink/Webkit. If Firefox falls, everything else is based on Blink/Webkit.