See longer post (not by me) there, if all is true then they should fall under both the spam and mass lemm.ee rule breaking defederation rules, both bigotry and abusive language, though not always in combination.

Also the covenant thing Mastodon has would probably be a good idea.

  • sunaurus@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would ask lemm.ee users to please use the report function whenever you see our rules being broken in any of our communities! A large volume of rule breaking users from a single instance would certainly push me to defederate that instance, and reports would be the main signal for me to gauge that.

    I don’t have the capacity to go out and vet content on other instances in general (as all admins, I am running lemm.ee as a volunteer out of my free time). I want to be upfront: I am not providing a curated service in terms of who we federate with. This is why I wrote todays post about administration and federation on lemm.ee. So please bear in mind that as a user on lemm.ee, you are expected to share some responsibility for keeping our communities clean, by always downvoting low quality content and reporting rule violations. In addition to downvoting and reporting, I personally also am a huge fan of people who have the energy to respond to bigots, explaining why they’re wrong (in civil terms) - even if there’s 0.001% chance of getting through to the particular author of a horrible comment, there is still a chance that a rebuttal in the response will be seen by someone else who will be affected in a positive direction.

    To be clear, I am not somebody that believes that all ideas should get a platform without exception. Quite the opposite, I am super happy to shut down hateful content. It’s just a matter of putting my energy where I think it is most useful. For example, I would rather spend a week worth of free time working on better moderation tools or better self-service tools for users to curate their own feed, than spend the same time going through external instances in order to figure out how many racists they have and how well are they moderating them. That is why I have made the decision (for now) to focus most of my moderation efforts on things that happen within lemm.ee, and not externally.

    I also want to say that I do not want to act hastily based on little information. I’m sure this will frustrate some of our users (and I’m very sorry about that), but I have not had time to research the Exploding Heads situation, and I don’t want to effectively create a new rift in the federated network, without first being absolutely sure that such an action is really necessary to protect lemm.ee users.

    By the way, regarding this the_donald situation on sh.itjust.works, the OP of the linked post said this:

    Since The_Donald was removed, I did not find more racist content on the mentioned servers. That is part their tactics.

    This seems like a great outcome to me - the_donald was removed and there is no more racist content. I would not think this is a good example of a reason to defederate another instance. I understand that part of the complaint is that the admin of sh.itjust.works took too long to respond to the situation, and as a user I can see why this would be frustrating, but as an admin, I can tell you that I can also see why he wanted to see evidence before acting. In the end, I really like that he removed the community as soon as he saw evidence of it being awful.

    Just to leave you with my main point, I do not want to federate with instances which aim to hurt our communities or users, but I need concrete and specific evidence of this before I take drastic action. So please report rule violations, and if I see that banning violators does not work, then defederation will certainly be the next move.

    • barsoap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do not want to federate with instances which aim to hurt our communities or users, but I need concrete and specific evidence of this before I take drastic action.

      Acting based on evidence is always good and proper. As to relying on reports for that I’m sceptical, though, or better put things aren’t quite there yet: A toxic community might be raiding some instance somewhere, that instance’s users are reporting like crazy, and you see none of it, consequently they could focus on one instance after the other, then change domains, rinse and repeat. Or at least that’s how I think it works (excuse my ignorance), there’s no global space where admins could see all reports. Would you even see a report from a lemm.ee user made in a community of another instance?

      It might be a good idea to have more options in the report dialog, not just because of this, regarding whom to actually report the post to, as well as a drop-down for reasons – a post on beehaw that I report might violate beehaw “be nice” rules, but it might or might not also violate lemm.ee rules so I may or may not want to report it here, too.

      It might also make sense to be able to report not just to mods/admins but specific communities who can then collate evidence and present it to admins (essentially /r/shitXXXsay but better), collating will be important because the harassment can be in the overall interaction pattern of a community, not just individual posts.


      All in all though, to get my head out of the clouds and back into the here and now: Please don’t be too principled as long as the tools and community to back up those principles aren’t in place. That is, err on the side of the banhammer if you see a preponderance of evidence because if you don’t those people are going to strategise around your principles, rules of evidence etc. to do their thing. We’re already seeing that with the “block users who want us gone so they can’t report us” type of tactic.

      Actually that looks like quite a misfeature: Someone blocking me shouldn’t preclude me from seeing their content. Another thing reddit got wrong.

      • SNEWSLEYPIES@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please don’t be too principled as long as the tools and community to back up those principles aren’t in place.

        I very much agree with this, @sunaurus@lemm.ee - your stance above is, I think, exactly as a stated policy should be, but please do remember that plans and reality must meet somewhere along the way. If you overthink things or cleave too religiously to the rules you’ve set yourself, you risk taking too long to act, and it’s exactly this delay between problem and reaction that bad actors exploit.

        Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face, basically. Lemm.ee is a great instance, and we’d all, I think, love to see it stay that way 🙂

    • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I reported hate speech advocates on this instance (I am writing from kbin) will my report go to you or to ernest ?

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Almost certainly to ernest. Anything you see or interact with while the kbin.social URL remains in your browser bar is coming from kbin.social. It may be content that originated elsewhere, but you’re always engaging with a local copy. So, that report button is on k-soc, and it reports to the k-soc admin.

        I don’t even know if kbin has a way of knowing who the remote admins even are.

        • SeriousBug@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, I was wondering where the reports go. Mastodon has an option to forward the report to the remote server admins too, maybe kbin/Lemmy will get something like that eventually.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds reasonable, as always.

      I just wanted to say, the high degree of federation was a big reason for me to join lemm.ee. I generally like to decide for myself what content I want to see or engage with (which does not mean I endorse it), and am grateful this instance allows me that.

      However, like OP, I also cross-posted the post to other communities since there are limits to tolerance. Some folks just love to push the limits, using “free speech” to push agendas which I cannot condone.

      For the time being, I’m happy the issue received attention and hope defederation will be used carefully as a measure of last resort.

  • vamp07@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the big deal? This sort of thing happens frequently. That’s why you have moderation and rules.

    • barsoap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy is a confederation of (ideally) self-moderating instances, individual instances can’t be expected to take up moderation load that should be covered by other instances – like the home instance of notorious brigaders like /r/the_donald folk.

      Or, differently put: See this post by our god emperor sunaurus.

      • vamp07@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about the moderators of the forums themselves? I would think that is the first line of defense. Instance moderators then step in if necessary, but that will only affect what happens at that instance?

        • barsoap@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Front lines are only as strong as the artillery backing them up.

    • skogens_ro@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This should be a safe place where we can all discuss our belief. Hateful disagreement must not be allowed.

      • vamp07@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        undefined> safe

        That’s a slippery slope. I say anything goes as long as it’s on topic and does not break the rules of the instance or specific forum.

        • Shit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t like conservative child groomers like you showing up and being uncivilized personally.

    • barsoap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because lemmy turned the contents of the link into a crazy wall of text.

  • markeuzu@exploding-heads.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    First of, im speaking for myself, not from EH. I find it funny to see my own comment pop by while I treated everyone in other federations with utmost respect. I recommend people reading this to check the whole thread to grab context. If you still think im some kind of evil nazi after that thats up to you. (Spoiler; I admit Transgender people need a private safespace and that I respect transgender people decisions, and defend them from an user that compares transgender people with a handicao, very alt right of me!)

    I also dont understand the refusal of OP of the original post to selfhost if they want to adminstrate what federations should and shouldnt be allowed.

    But in the end everyone is free to make their own choices and can make multiple accounts. I personally have multiple accounts but I dont even use them to engage on other federations. I want to give everyone the fair chance to block my opinions and shitposts. In fact I encourage everyone to do so if they dont want to see me post about minimalistic/frugal living and self improvement. I still appreciate you for who you are but we dont have to like eachother.

    Im also asking OP (mistake i didnt see it was a meta post my bad barsoap, I meant the guy from the original post) to remove my sentence as its taking out of context and is used to ragefarm. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rage_farming

    Thats very disrespectful of him and saying more about his character than mine.

    Again, I have zero to do with EH except using their servers to host a community im interested in after I lost it on Reddit. There is no mastermind at work pulling the strings here. Thats straight up delusional.

    Ill leave it at that and block the original poster “calling me out” (if you can even call it that) in a couple minutes as I dont want see him going around targeted harassing me. He obviously doesnt respect people with a different political alignment even if they say nothing wrong.

    • barsoap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, I have zero to do with EH except using their servers to host a community im interested in after I lost it on Reddit.

      There’s a German saying, “Mitgefangen, mitgehangen”: Caught together, hung together. If you don’t want people to assume you’re a Nazi maybe don’t hang out in their backyard.

      …and if you didn’t notice but only notice now, well, maybe it’s time to high-tail out of there. Plenty of instances out there and it’s not like your community over there would already be up and running, it’s in the “all posts are by the mod” phase.

      I also dont understand the refusal of OP of the original post to selfhost if they want to adminstrate what federations should and shouldnt be allowed.

      Why don’t you self-host an instance for your community so that you have better control over who federates with it and who doesn’t?

      If you want to, sure, go ahead but self-hosting shouldn’t be a requirement to even have an opinion on these matters.

      • markeuzu@exploding-heads.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dont have to be educated on what Germans think about nazis. I remember that little time period where you guys took over my country, pillaged it and murdered my people for not agreeing with your nazi leaders. And pretty much every part of Europe.

        I dont have to high tail out of any place, I just dont want to be bullied by people like you harassing me with comments out of context.

        • hypelightfly@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not just Germans. If you associate with Nazi’s (you are) then you are a Nazi. You actively made that choice.

          • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honest question, from someone who absolutely does not want to associate with nazis:

            I can understand leaving an instance that allows nazis, but there has to be some limit to “don’t ever associate with nazis” - a silly example perhaps, but if a nazi moves into my town, do I have to leave town?

            I mean, I understand leaving Fediverse instances and moving from a town in real life are two totally different things, but at the same time, it’s the same principle - don’t stay where nazis are allowed. Even if it’s pretty clear cut that you should leave the instance, I’m just saying that perhaps sometimes there are exceptions to the “don’t stay where nazis are allowed” rule.

            • barsoap@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, it depends. If Nazis are coming to your town you should organise and make them leave again, or at least keep their head down and out of sight. You know, the usual Antifa stuff: Friendly letter to e.g. venues whether they really want to host Nazis, to landlords, to employers, whatnot. Raise the social cost of doing Nazi things. Collecting sufficient intelligence is always the first line of action, the second is a thorough analysis of the situation, choosing the right mode of action to have the maximum amount of people behind you etc, anything else is actionism. If in doubt, be creative.

              If, OTOH, you move to a small village in East Germany and, participating in an ordinary village grill-out suddenly realise everyone is laughing at the Holocaust joke someone wrote on their BBQ smoker – you’re probably the only non-Nazi there. For your own safety and sanity, yep, high-tail out of there. If your safety and sanity aren’t in danger in that situation chances are you’re a Nazi, or at least sufficiently adjacent.

              At least over here they really tried the “just a regular guy doing regular things, nothing to see, helpful friendly chap” approach, e.g. Nazis joining volunteer fire brigades, in an attempt to normalise themselves. As in Germany the municipalities can’t generally prevent someone from joining up the rest of the fire department threatened resignation which then gave the municipality the necessary reason to deny the Nazi membership.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still mandate that people are far too sensitive - stop with the victim mentality or go join an echo chamber like beehaw (or go back to reddit).