• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There have been multiple school shootings this year alone.

    That’s not actually really relevant to the point. First, despite there being multiple school shootings this year, school shootings are a tiny fraction of the overall homicides in the US, which are, in turn, dwarfed by the number of suicides committed with firearms. Second, looking at your link you provided, you see a lot of things like, “A gun was fired during a fight near a basketball game at Appoquinimink High School. No injuries were reported”, and “Bullets struck two windows of classrooms at PS 78 in the Stapleton neighborhood of Staten Island. One classroom was occupied by ten adults, but no bullets entered the classrooms” being counted as "school shootings:, which you then compare to Columbine. You are intentionally, and in bad faith, conflating entirely different things, and placing them all under the heading of, “firearms near schools”.

    That is not relevant. Targeted violence in school isn’t tolerable either.

    It is relevant, because it has different causes, and is thus addressed differently.

    Are you willing to engage in good faith, or have you already decided that the only solution is banning firearms?

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      First, despite there being multiple school shootings this year, school shootings are a tiny fraction of the overall homicides in the US

      Which are also often committed with guns…

      which are, in turn, dwarfed by the number of suicides committed with firearms.

      I’m not talking about suicide.

      Second, looking at your link you provided, you see a lot of things like, “A gun was fired during a fight near a basketball game at Appoquinimink High School. No injuries were reported”, and “Bullets struck two windows of classrooms at PS 78 in the Stapleton neighborhood of Staten Island. One classroom was occupied by ten adults, but no bullets entered the classrooms” being counted as "school shootings:, which you then compare to Columbine. You are intentionally, and in bad faith, conflating entirely different things, and placing them all under the heading of, “firearms near schools”.

      I did nothing of the sort. There are multiple bona fide school shootings in that list, such as the Michigan State shooting and the Covenant shooting.

      It is relevant, because it has different causes, and is thus addressed differently.

      That’s not a meaningful answer. Let’s have some details.

      Are you willing to engage in good faith, or have you already decided that the only solution is banning firearms?

      Are you willing to engage in good faith? So far, you’ve argued based on false premises (namely that school shootings are rare, and that there are no bona fide school shootings in the previously linked Wikipedia list) and evasive non-answers (namely that targeted violence at school is to be “addressed differently”, with no explanation of how). Doesn’t seem like good faith to me.