UsedChicken@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRuleionairei.imgur.comimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1811arrow-down10
arrow-up1811arrow-down1imageRuleionairei.imgur.comUsedChicken@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareWabiSabiPapi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoimagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing. does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?
minus-squareThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoDoes it justify it? Not at all. Does it make it slightly less bad? Yes.
minus-squarezbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago slightly less bad What is even the point of making that point though? Do we give him a cookie for being a “nice” exploiter?
imagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing.
does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?
Does it justify it? Not at all.
Does it make it slightly less bad? Yes.
What is even the point of making that point though? Do we give him a cookie for being a “nice” exploiter?