• Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you elaborate on “limited”? Surely that is what we want. One of the problems with the Play store is certainly not that it does not have a wide enough selection, but rather that it is full of harmful, hostile, dangerous, exploitive software. Any solution to that problem is necessarily going to limit (or one might prefer to say curate) its contents. That is exactly why I use F-Droid. It is limited to software that is not trying to hurt me.

        • lickmysword@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess F-Droid is limited in the sense of low user awareness? Similar to lemmy in the sense that its just not that popular atm, but maybe its gaining popularity?

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but that’s not going to be helped by making something new that’s “compelling” – which is the topic at hand

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Those products that you “need” to function as professionals are never going to be available in a way that does not exploit you and put you at risk. You’re always going to be trapped with the incumbent marketplace’s shitty practices until you take steps to meet those needs in some other way.

            You do not have to personally audit every application you use. After all, you DON’T audit closed applications, and neither does anyone else. At least with an application with code available under a public license, other people have the ability to review it and raise concerns. I can’t see how you can cast that as a disadvantage, just because you don’t personally want to audit the software yourself.

            Personally, I’m not comfortable predicating my very livelihood on closed, commercial software that somebody else owns and leverages with the specific intention of exploiting me. That sounds like fucking madness to me.

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can I get my banking app on F-Droid? How about my home security system app? How about a dozen other apps that I want or need, and can’t be replaced by loading a website in Firefox?

      • butter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is entirely on the companies. There’s no technical reason or requirement for this happening.

        Fdroid works great and is the most likely thing to be adopted, in my opinion. It’s easy enough for anyone to spin up their own fdroid server and distribute their own app.

        If you’re wanting to use a new store, you’re going to have to wade through the growing pains of adoption. It’s just a fact of life.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m still waiting for Linux on desktop to be a big thing like I thought back in 2004. I suspect the third party app stores will be just as quick.

      • Cris@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, I assume if you install a banking app through Aurora it still works? Totally fair if that doesn’t work for your needs (you kinda need a google account, even if a blank one, to have it work right now) but I assume installing apps through it doesn’t limit them or make them less functional for having been installed through Aurora?