• narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, but with Proton, the email service is built-in, while BitWarden relies on an external service (say a domain you use for catch-all).

    • Yote.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bitwarden supports AnonAddy, DuckDuckGo, Fastmail, Firefox Relay, and SimpleLogin. I use it with my paid SimpleLogin account using the SimpleLogin default email domain (configurable in your settings - can be a SL-owned domain or your own).

      I’m guessing ProtonPass just uses SimpleLogin on the backend since SimpleLogin is owned by Proton. I don’t think there’s really much difference unless you count 1-party being an advantage instead of 2-party.

      Edit: O there is a difference in cost - not sure if this is what you meant. Bitwarden+SL will cost more (assuming introductory $1/month pricing on ProtonPass)

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s great that Bitwarden integrates with other services. It’s just very convenient to have it completely built in, especially for inexperienced users. You don’t need to do any setup, and if the password manager is smart enough to suggest using an alias automatically when a registration requires an email address, it’s a no-brainer.

        • valkyrie@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          How many inexperienced users are using a password manager with an email aliasing service?

          • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know, but there’s no denying that it’s more convenient. Whether you see that as a relevant advantage is up to you.