Edit

I kinda made this post out of spite for the fact the most previous post in this community, whose title I quoted/copied, was getting so many downvotes… At the time I posted this, the previous post had about a 30% downvote rate, and it really, really made me mad.

I am relieved tho to see people in the comments here who have real, actual empathy for their fellow humans. Thank you for contributing here.

It blows my mind how normalized it is to hate on those who are struggling. Especially in 20fucking23 when so many of us now are on the verge of it ourselves. Let’s be better, everyone - to everyone. I beg you.

  • steventrouble@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m so sick of people talking about needles whenever homeless people come up. It’s slander, plain and simple.

    I used to live in Seattle directly next door to a homeless encampment. I used to walk by it every single day for 2 years. I have never ONCE seen a needle on the ground, day or night. You know what I did see a bunch of? People claiming that there were needles everywhere, without a shred of evidence.

  • moog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i dont mind letting people use public areas as a place to stay for the night. but its not just a place to stay for them. its a place to do drugs, shit and piss all over the place, steal from and harrass and assault everyone around them, and let their trash pile up and attract pests. its a huge problem where i am and these people are fucking terrifying to be around. like, i dont want to be inhumane to anyone but where do we draw the line?

    • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      , i dont want to be inhumane to anyone but where do we draw the line?

      Imo we draw the line when someone who wants to be housed is threatened with being houseless and provide them with housing. Providing housing first is also the best way to deal with all the issues connected to being houseless like drug use, trauma from violence, mental health issues, etc

      Imo the line has been crossed long ago and gets crossed every day and its important to keep in mind when trying to find solutions that are more like band aids on a broken system.

    • adderaline@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      they are alive, so they need to shit and piss. they consume things, so they will create trash. if they are addicted to drugs, they need a place to do them. if we don’t provide for people public restrooms, public trash receptacles, and places to do drugs safely, they will do them in public where you can see them. nothing about any of these behaviors are unique to unhoused people, you just don’t see housed folks getting high and shitting in the street because they because have a far more comfortable, safe place to do their private business. you don’t see housed people’s trash because they have a bin to put it in that takes all the trash to the dump. how are they supposed to do anything different when they have nowhere else to go?

      this whole antipathy towards people on the street makes me so fucking angry. they can’t go anywhere else. they have to keep all of their belongings out on the sidewalk, they have to shit on the fucking street, they have no other options but to live every moment of their lives in a public place, and we pass judgement on them when it doesn’t look pretty. these are human beings you’re talking about, not pests, not monsters, they’re people that you’re watching live in abject poverty, and all you can muster up is fear and disgust. its disgraceful.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Youtuber i seen with a trend of stealth camping in urban locations, had a video of camping overnight in the middle of a roundabout with a lot of shrubbery. And it had kind of a survival horror feel with cops patrolling around, and i remembered…this guy existing in a public space at night shouldnt be this terrifying or feel so taboo.

  • 257m@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also don’t think people realize how much more space efficient tent cities are. If they buy a giant ass suburban that has a driveway half the size of the house and backyard of perfectly manicured grass that no one walks on it brings house prices up. If do actually want them to start getting off the street try your best to support them and be a good person. If not leave them the fuck alone and atleast don’t make their lives more difficult than it already is.

  • Seaguy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree… public space is our space. No one’s need is greater than anyone else’s. The homeless need help, the pubic space that we use to get to the store, play with our children, buff highway noise is not the place to get that. Now, I’m not saying financially penalizing or jailing them are the only alternatives but safe camping/RV spots with access to access social services, Wi-Fi, gather for ac/heater, etc seems like a better approach.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d rather we just give them housing and a support network to prevent homelessness in the first place. Until then, homeless people have a right to access third spaces for as long as they don’t have a living space.

  • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly some of these comments really dont fit to the solar punk ideals and should get removed.

    Especially because land squatting, building low tech communes and working together on problems is what happens in many of those camps and thats just so solar punk to me.

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t really think injecting fentanyl in a tent on the sidewalk should be classed as ‘building a low tech commune’

      • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nope nope nope nope nope. How do you know what communities and organizations the people in the tents belong to? Or how they’ve organized their network of tents and mutual aid, what relationships they have with nearby homeowners and business owners, how they gather and share resources and make decisions?

        Squatters and the unhoused routinely, out of necessity, form partnerships and communities with other unhoused and insufficiently housed people. We’d call those communities “communes” if they were made of rich white people owning homes. And yeah, people in those communities use drugs just like people who own houses do.

        Thinking more deeply about it, I think you’ve identified by example one of the many ways neoliberal ideology encourages discrimination against unhoused people. Neoliberalism teaches us that every unhoused person is an individual whose individual choices are to blame for his low social and economic status. So we assume unhoused people are alone, that they don’t belong to communities, that they have no family or social support, that they don’t have a network of mutual aid - even though, when someone is unhoused, having networks of mutual aid are even more important than they are for people with secure housing. And that lets us dismiss the unhoused as people without social connections who only care about their personal self interest.

        But no, that dude in the tent shooting up fent probably is part of a commune. He meets with other unhoused people to pool money and buy food or take advantage of free meals at the local gurdwara or use a gym membership to take a shower. He advises newly homeless people, he seeks advice from elders in the community, he hangs out outside his tent or at a local meeting spot and chats with other community members. He’s part of a network of mutual aid that shares intellectual and social and financial resources to help each other in their disadvantaged circumstances. And if he’s not in a network of mutual aid which fits the definition of a commune, it’s not because he can’t be, but because he chooses not to be.

        Unhoused people are not animals. They are humans. That means they communicate with other humans. And that means the unhoused form the same networks of politics and society and economics and mutual aid as everyone else.

  • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You don’t need to be an empathetic holistic person to get behind free housing for the homeIess. If you’re a truly selfish and purely economically oriented person, then you have to admit giving the homless free homes is economically the best solution for all involved. Alternatives include the taxpayer eating the cost of all the damage they do seeking shelter and survival, or paying a ton of money to police to violently deal with them.

    If you prefer those to giving them housing, you’re choosing options that are more cruel and more costly – I don’t understand how that makes sense and yet plenty of people seem to choose that.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because many people perceive homelessness as a proxy for moral failings (such as drug abuse) worthy of punishment.

      Of course this is rarely the full picture or even true at all, but we need to get people to understand that this is not a problem that can be solved by punishing people.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Then surely those same people are working to destigmatize it and provide help right?

      Right?

  • Canis_76@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Public spaces typically have intended uses. When those spaces aren’t used for what they are intended, something needs to change. When the homeless set up 1000 survival spaces in a public park… the rest of us should suffer because of their bad decisions/luck? Use your energy to make a difference instead of an ineffectual post. Vote in better policy makers.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If someone sets up a spot to sleep and keep their stuff close to your house, try talking to them like a person. I live in the City, so there are plenty of people I see all the time. Sometimes they ask for help, sometimes we just talk. I help when I can, but I also say no when I can’t. I stand outside and talk to some of the struggling people close to me for a while sometimes. They’re just people

      • j_roby@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We need more of this right here in the world. Thank you for being an empathetic and decent human.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The healthy homeless people struggling in my city get plenty of aid. The ones you find camping out are the ones who choose to be homeless, and the ones too mentally ill to seek help. But since we’ve become so sensitive, we just let them sleep outside instead of forcing them into programs. Until we accept that the mentally ill homeless who refuse aid need to be picked up and forced into it, things will never change.

    • j_roby@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      See, this is part of the issue. Too many people recognize the problems, but as soon as any solutions to those problems inconvenience them, any empathy for those problems then goes right out the window…

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember this guy in my city set up fake signs for the opening of a new homeless shelter in one of the wealthier and more liberal neighbourhoods in the city, where the “provide for the homeless!” Crowd tend to live.

        The neighborhood was up in arms at the idea of the shelter getting set up in THEIR neighborhood. There’s a video about it around somewhere.

    • keeb420@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind the homeless through no fault of their own camping on my street. But I’ve seen plenty of drugged out mofos camping in front of or near my work I wouldn’t want anywhere near my house or those of my neighbors who have kids. I’m talking about the mofos who take apart cars and bikes and whatever else and then just leave everything when they move on. The mofos with piles of garbage that attract rats bigger than cats.

  • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For a “Solar punk” instance, this community seems to have very little of the “punk” aspect, and in these comments it sounds more like a “Solar rich liberal” place.

    The amount of slander towards homeless people, the propagating of stereotypes, and the removal of personhood in these comments really blows my mind. There are even people defending that homeless people should be sent to prison and have their life managed for them; others claim how it’s their own fault they are homeless; some cry about “private property”.

    And of course a bunch of people claiming this isn’t a final/permanent solution, and so it shouldn’t be done… as if to say, until we come up with better solutions, these people should just go without shelter. What is really a priority to them, is not having to look at homeless people.

    In a nutshell: “It’s their own fault! They’re probably all heroin addicts anyway. Someone else should come up with and implement better solutions, but in the meantime I don’t want to have to see and walk by people who don’t have a home!”. A Solar Punk Neolib community.

  • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would be cool with chill people setting up tents for a day or two or at night or whatever. But who’s going to be picking the used heroin needles up out of the grass and wrangling the drug dealers and gang members when they start showing up? The reason peole don’t want tent villages is this, not because they simply hate the “unhoused”.

    • Ixoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Making some pretty out there assumptions about the kind of people who are homeless, my dude…

    • steventrouble@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t pretend like you’ve ever seen a needle on the ground. People that say stuff like that are too scared to even walk near a homeless camp, let alone look at the ground while you do so.

  • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m fine with this in theory, but in practice the homeless/unhoused don’t care whether the property is private or not. I have witnessed them trying to set up tents in people’s yards multiple times. Not even big yards, we are talking condo yards.