• Chetzemoka@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They mean meeting the needs of the US. France is the size of Texas. What works in France doesn’t translate to the US because of our sheer geographic size. China is the only country with high speed rail that compares in geographic size to the US.

    But we absolutely could and should have high speed rail corridors that cover the east coast and west coast separately.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. The USA should have high speed rail, but it isn’t going to be one continuous network. We also shouldn’t set the expectation for transcontinental high speed rail trips as the marker for success because that is going to lead to poor investment in HSR.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah honestly northeast corridor is the way to do it and just explode the investment in the DC to New York space.

        After that it can expand north and south to cover more of the East Coast. Hopefully west coast can do their own and then maybe express train connections to cities in the center to fill in over time