• irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So, you support a system that inherently creates an upper class of obscenely rich people, yet are opposed to those people?

      A system set up to enrich the owner of a business, while its workers lose out, creates exactly the people you claim not to defend.

      • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I’m not opposed to them… I just don’t support them. They can support themselves, and I can support myself just fine. I make more money from them than I would without them, and they make money from me they wouldn’t have otherwise had my skillset to access easily.

        I’ve never been forced to take any job… I just manage my skillset in such a way that makes it both rare and valuable. I’ve worn many hats over the years, and I just play the game instead of bitching about the rules Worked out great for me and my family so far. I’ll even have some to leave my kids so they don’t have as hard of a time reaching even higher than I have. That’s the whole point, for me: make my kids’ life better than mine, and I’ve done that so far.

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, I’m not opposed to them… I just don’t support them.

          It doesn’t work like that. They are in power, and by not opposing them, you consent to their continued power.

          I make more money from them than I would without them,

          That isn’t even close to true. Capitalist extraction of surplus value is exactly how they make their profits. If they paid you the value you made them, they wouldn’t have a profit. If they weren’t there to extract that value, you and your fellow workers would make more - it’s basic mathematics.

          and they make money from me they wouldn’t have otherwise had my skillset to access easily.

          This part is true, yes.

          I’ve never been forced to take any job…

          So, you’re saying you’re able to retire right now and never work again?

          I just play the game instead of bitching about the rules

          That’s a slave mindset.

          That’s the whole point, for me: make my kids’ life better than mine, and I’ve done that so far.

          That’s cool you can think that small and that selfishly. Others, however, realise you could be living even better, and everyone else, including those with nothing, could have that standard of living, too, if we stop being complacent with mere crumbs.

          That’s what you have. Mere crumbs of luxury. It’s great that you’re not on the street, but that is an incredibly low standard to have.

      • SneakyThunder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Markets are nothing more than voluntary association. Most, if not every “obscenely rich” person got this rich because of govt interference (lobbying, govt sanctioned monopoly, corporate welfare, subsidies, etc.)

        “Organic” market economy would be beneficial to everyone

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry, but a market requires a state to protect it. How else are we gonna make sure no one steals our shit?

              • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s nice, but the claim was that a market cannot exist without a state. It clearly can. Nobody needs to outsource their security. I’m not sure what efficiency has to do with this.

                  • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    An example of someone taking ownership of their own security? If so, the most basic form would be carrying a firearm for defense instead of relying on police. If you want an example with more of a link to the market, how about a illicit drug dealer who protects their person and property?

                    Edit: Upon reflection, it seems that the existence of any black market proves the point.