• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need to have body cams standardized across the board. We always assumed cops say the truth. Their testimony passes as truth in court. After finding out how much they lie, we need to hold them accountable.

    • doctorskull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      And harsh penalties (that are actually enforced) for officers turning them off or obstructing them in any way

      • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even better, an automatic presumptuon of guilt with weapon discharges and camera “malfunctions” with the onus on the officer to raise an affirmative defense successfully. Is it going to be burdensome for the police? Yes. But that’s the fucking point. Weapon discharges should be a true life or death last resort only

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even the military require that soldiers request a go ahead when they need to fire their weapon. Cops should do the same at a minimum. Or face consequences.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      we have HAD body cams, and they have NOT been held accountable. They make things WORSE because if they catch something on camera later they can use it against you even if it had nothing to do with what was being recorded at the time.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”

          Is not “anything you say may or may not be used to help prove your innocence”

          they tell you flat out they’re out to get you even if they know they’re wrong