• Mossy Feathers (She/They)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The idea of throwing something into space isn’t anything new, tbh I’ve always kinda wondered why no one has spent more time developing it.

    Edit: I wonder how many Gs the rocket experiences while spinning, and if a human could theoretically survive it long enough to get thrown into space. I can see it now: rockets becoming luxury space vehicles for rich people while the spin launch is how poor people commute to the space dock.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      The projectile experiences wicked g-forces when it is being spun up: around 10,000 times the force of gravity. This is enough to tear the skin and muscle off a human being. This means SpinLaunch will not be going into the astronaut business. They also won’t be able to drive large satellites into orbit. The projected weight limit for the system would be payloads of about 440 pounds. That is a lot less than something like the Hubble Space Telescope weighs. – source

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jesus fuck. I know humans can withstand extremely high g-forces for short periods of time, but 10,000 Gs is a lotta Gs.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it would have to be crazy long up the side of a mountain or something to work. I always thought that would be cool to see. I’m just an ignorant layperson though. I know little of the actual science, but I have read a lot of science fiction in my life.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think it would need to be all that long. The Navy considered putting railguns on ships, they decided against it because they figured out pretty quickly that the munitions would have to be shot lower than the horizon so that they weren’t firing shots into space, if they missed the target.

            • SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was wondering why they would care about firing shots into space, but then I realized that it’s probably not enough velocity to escape our orbit and would just add to the orbital debris issue.

              If the velocity was such that the projectile could exit our orbit, it would probably be less risky.

              There’s an interesting excerpt from one of the Expanse books about how all the rounds they fire from their space ships are probably going to travel through space for millions of years before they actually hit something.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      …if a human could theoretically survive it long enough to get thrown into space.

      The answer is ‘no’. This thing would spin all the blood out of your body, and then when it actually launches you, your body would get shattered by the shock, and then shattered again a millisecond later as your spacecraft plows into the atmosphere at a few mach number.