• time_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    But the real issue, to me, is that no one takes an oath specifically to “support” the constitution. If the presidential oath isn’t an example of supporting it, then Article Ii makes no sense at all - why would it even be there?

    I’m sure the righter part of the SC will find a reason :|