narwhal@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoAbout half of Bandcamp employees have been laid offwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1298arrow-down111cross-posted to: technews@radiation.partyghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.worldmusic@beehaw.orgtechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1287arrow-down1external-linkAbout half of Bandcamp employees have been laid offwww.theverge.comnarwhal@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square48fedilinkcross-posted to: technews@radiation.partyghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.worldmusic@beehaw.orgtechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareAmju WolflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoAhh my bad, can’t read apparently. That amount of employees sounds way more reasonable, even if I feel like they weren’t doing much.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoJust think of half of your company getting laid off, that’s going to be noticable regardless of the total number of employees.
minus-squareAmju Wolflinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoOh yeah no question about that. My point was just that I don’t understand why you’d need so many people for such a fairly simple project - with such a narrow scope; but that’s moot since they didn’t have that many people after all.
Ahh my bad, can’t read apparently. That amount of employees sounds way more reasonable, even if I feel like they weren’t doing much.
Just think of half of your company getting laid off, that’s going to be noticable regardless of the total number of employees.
Oh yeah no question about that. My point was just that I don’t understand why you’d need so many people for such a fairly simple project - with such a narrow scope; but that’s moot since they didn’t have that many people after all.