Here we go again…

  • sadie_sorceress@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    My kids’ school recently had an active shooter drill like we used to do fire drills when I was a kid. They said they all had hiding spots to go to and they thought it was pretty scary. They’re in elementary school. It’s definitely not normal that instead of doing something about the guns we have to teach kids to hide from gunmen because that’s just a legit possibility now.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had these in middle school… Which would have been the late 1990’s…

        It’s definitely normal… I’m not sure what the person you responded to is going on about.

        • sadie_sorceress@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well maybe my school was the outlier that didn’t have active shooter drills but that makes it even worse that it’s been 30+ years and nothing has changed. It should NOT be normal to have to prepare elementary kids to hide from an active shooter in their school.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            that it’s been 30+ years

            Uh? 2023-(late)1990s… = ~25… Please god don’t make me older than I am… I just can’t take that today.

            and nothing has changed.

            But it has, MORE schools do it now. So it’s even MORE normal now.

            It should NOT be normal to have to prepare elementary kids to hide from an active shooter in their school.

            This is a different statement than before. I agree that it should not have to be a normal thing… But unfortunately that’s what it is. But it’s not gun policies that make this the normal. If we want to talk specifically about school shootings… It doesn’t seem that legislation on gun bans alone have made any difference. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/school-shootings-by-state

            California is by far the worst state for school shootings, and has what amounts to the strictest laws in all of the USA.

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was in high school in the early 90s, we never had active ahooter drills, we just had the occasional lockdown due to gang wars…

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is entirely possible that the timelines for their introductions were different.

          Also it is only more worrying that the problem is left unadressed since 25 years. Again nothing should be normal about school children having to learn how to hide from someone with a gun trying to kill as many of them as possible.

          The US truly seems like a failed state from the outside.

          • Stumblinbear
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unaddressed is a bit harsh. Maybe not fully addressed to how we would like, but measures have been attempted in the last quarter century

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            And what EU country is rolling in success right now?

            If you’re going to walk into a conversation and the only thing you have to add is “The US truly seems like a failed state from the outside.” You’re not actually going to further that conversation at all.

            Also it is only more worrying that the problem is left unadressed since 25 years.

            What is unaddressed? What problem do you think exists here? Every time I see this argument it’s always stupidly phrased. The UK has lower rates therefore it must be gun control…

            Look at the intentional homicide rates… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

            Notice something? It’s South America that’s completely fucked. If we ban guns in the US… nothing stops that shit from proliferating into the USA on the southern border. Our issues are more handled with better border controls and increase mental welfare. Most violence that happens here is gang violence.

            But for one moment let’s look at this list. Notice the British Virgin Islands place on this list… Very similar controls to Britain proper… but has a 2 point higher rate than the USA…

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The issue of school shootings, and other acts of violence with the sole intent to kill random people. These things happen about once in a decade in most western countries.

              In the US they happen all the fucking time. Especially that people go out of their way to murder a bunch of elementary kids is something happening extremely rarely in other countries.Not so in the US.

              In no point did i argue about the particular reasons or solutions, but it is evident that the US is really fucked up in this regard.

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The issue of school shootings, and other acts of violence with the sole intent to kill random people. These things happen about once in a decade in most western countries.

                Uhh… I already addressed this… The link, if you had read it shows homicide rates per country. Sort by rate, look where your country is compared to the USA… then compared to some other “western” countries. Sort by Region/Subregion… Allow yourself to think about why the US might have problems. The US does have higher rates… The EU itself is surrounded

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_Kingdom
                Not only are mass shootings common…

                In no point did i argue about the particular reasons or solutions,

                Correct, and I never said you did. I said that the argument I always hear from people who make claims like the USA is fucked up is bullshit. Showing an example of a country over here that’s ruled by Britain with British law, doing significantly worse than the USA does. Almost like it’s different over here. Probably because the EU is buffered from the third world countries… while the USA is definitely not.

                but it is evident that the US is really fucked up in this regard.

                It’s really not. But see, you never elaborated on what is “unaddressed” either. So there’s no way to further this discussion is there?

                • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You cannot use overall homicide rates as an indicator for mass shootings.Of course a high homicide rate is a problem in itself, vut it is a different quality, when two drug gangs shoot each other up over a deal gone wrong than someone just running into a school killing two dozen kids

                  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You cannot use overall homicide rates as an indicator for mass shootings.

                    Good think the source is specifically mass shootings?

                    And yes you can treat one countries overall homicide rates as relevant to anothers… Just because you lower gun related incidents doesn’t mean that it actually affected much of anything when those numbers simply transfer to other forms of homicide. Rates in general have been going down overtime in all “western” countries… at effectively the same rates… Gun laws have not made any significant effect as far as I’ve ever seen.

                    than someone just running into a school killing two dozen kids

                    Except EVERY source cited against anything I’ve ever said has ALWAYS been “well theres 600+ mass shootings in the USA this year”… when there’s like 20 that are actually school related. And yeah 20 is bad and sad… but when other countries have 1 or 2 and we’re 10x+ bigger than those countries… it’s literally on PAR per capita.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My friend’s daughter is in elementary school and an active shooter came into the school. Nobody died, but later he bought her a bulletproof backpack designed for AR-15 rounds (223). But the backpack was so heavy she couldn’t carry books in it. So instead he opted for handgun rounds protection, which isn’t ideal but it’s something.