• DigitalTraveler42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          1 year ago

          No dummy, this type of shit is exactly what increases domestic violence, spousal rape, and spousal murder.

          Time to grow the fuck up and realize a wife isn’t a sex doll combined with a domestic servant.

          If this is your religion telling you this then fuck your religion, and any other religion that offers abusive lines of thinking like this.

            • Cows Look Like Maps@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you realize that just saying no to everything doesn’t constitute an actual discussion? How about giving an actual reason or logic for what you’re arguing rather than just saying no increasingly louder like a child. Or is that what your priest told you when you started asking questions?

                • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Some discussions don’t merit justification.

                  What you have offered, Fishshake, is not discussion at all, but a toddler-like repetition of the word “no” as though you are just now learning the power of language. Congratulations on your personal milestone there, buddy. But I don’t feel like waiting for you to reach maturity so I am blocking you now. Feel free to have the last word, and be sure to “no” it all to hell so that others can get a laugh out of it too. Buhbye.

            • forrgott@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              The facts don’t care about your feelings, idiot (and the facts say you’re completely wrong).

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re describing enabling domestic abuse, even though you think you aren’t.

        • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you provide us a detailed description of how divorces and marriages should work instead of one sentences per comment? I’m genuinely curious.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did some hurt you? Was you no longer able to abuse or control someone? Because you feel really strongly about this. Our are you just trolling?

    • work is slow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      People can already divorce if they are being abused or cheated on. By making it a legal requirement that must be proven you make it more difficult for these people to leave those marriages and put the burden of proof onto them. You aren’t going to reduce domestic abuse with a policy like that.

        • Kalkaline @leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Divorce isn’t shameful. You have no idea why people get divorced. Your immaturity is showing bright and clear in these comments. You sound like I did in middle school.

            • Locuralacura@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why do you believe that? I mean, I can understand if you personally don’t want to get divorced, but what about other people ? Would you restrict their ability to get divorced because of your personal belief?

              Should all people who get divorced and remarried be forced back into their original marriage?

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So kidnapping and imprisonment is what marriage is to you?

      Marriage is a pact based on love and partnership, what you’re suggesting is slavery.

      You got some major incel vibes going on bro, time to take yourself to a licensed mental health professional.

    • CarbonIceDragon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trying to keep someone in a marriage that they do not want to be in is inherently abusive, so trying to prove it in the event that one party did not allow the marriage to be ended would be redundant.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. You should be able to leave a marriage for whatever reason you want. There should be a small barrier to avoid overloading the courts, but that’s it.