• pranaless
      link
      fedilink
      318 months ago
      use std::process::Command;
      
      fn main() {
          Command::new("sh")
              .arg("-c")
              .arg("echo Hello World!")
              .spawn()
              .unwrap();
      }
      

      Like this?

      • @30p87@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        108 months ago

        No, more like

        use std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh").arg("-c").arg("echo Hello World!").spawn().unwrap(); }
        

        .
        Just a little bit shorter, as it seems /s

          • pranaless
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Yes and no. While coreutils does provide an echo binary, shells also have a built-in for optimisation purposes.

            At first I had the code calling the binary directly, but then changed it to spawning a shell (and so using the builtin). It’s very cursed either way.

  • umbraroze
    link
    fedilink
    208 months ago

    Oh you fancy PC people and your fancy syscall instruction.

    I still don’t know why I could remember jsr $ab1e. I didn’t even write that much assembly.

    • @AVincentInSpace
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      That looks like a 6502 instruction. What system is it from?

  • r00ty
    link
    fedilink
    198 months ago

    Or, you could just go the whole hog. Create your own simple CPU emulator, design a basic 8bitesque CPU, give it an output port that is the console, and load up some basic ASM to cycle through Hello World to the console port.

  • DumbAceDragon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 months ago

    echo "Hello world"

    This is different from the other two echos here, this is Nim not Bash.

  • @Speiser0@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Definitely left. Right one won’t be optimized. (And there are so many some mistakes in your inline asm…)

      • @Speiser0@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        68 months ago

        Mostly the missing listing of clobbered registers. Other than that it’s mostly just that you’re doing useless things, like manually putting the stuff into the registers instead of letting the compiler do it, and the useless push and pop. And the loop is obviously not needed and would hurt performance if you do every write like that.

        asm!(
        "syscall",
        in("rax") 1,
        in("rdi") 1,
        in("rsi") text_ptr,
        in("rdx") text_size,
        
        )
        

        (“so many” was inappropriate, sorry.)

  • @DNOS@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Ec Emm this side is the best one …

    ++++++++[< +++++++++>-]<. ++++[<+++++++>-]<+. +++++++… +++.

    ++++++[<+++++++>-]<++. ------------. ++++++[<+++++++++>-]<+. <. +++. ------. --------.

    ++++[<++++++++>-]<+.