The museum row in 2020 focused on the project’s collaboration with the Inner Mongolia Museum in Hohhot, China. Chinese authorities demanded that certain words, including “Genghis Khan”, “empire” and “Mongol”, be taken out of the French show.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So… China was okay with an exhibit on Genghis Kahn and the Mongol empire, as long as it didn’t contain the words “Genghis Khan”, “Mongol” or “empire”. Sure! That sounds sane, reasonable, and motivated purely by academic interests!

    • RandAlThor@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      Erasing the ethnic identity of the Mongolians. Suppress Mongolian nationalism. This is a playbook of the Han Chinese not just since CCP but centuries before. This is what they are doing to the Uyghurs right now. They are flooding Tibet with massive Han migration so that Tibetans become a minority and eventually assimilate them over time so that Tibetans as an identity will disappear. They are known for erasing histories of people they do not like, re-write history to fit the narrative of the current dynasty. Some of the most disruptive archaeological discoveries have been evidences of people and civilizations that have no recorded history in Chinese history as maintained by the Mandarins. That’s what they are doing.

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “woke indoctrination destroying the great history of our unconquered nation”

  • Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why should anyone give half a fuck about what China thinks of what they should do in their own countries?

    I hope the French politely told then to go fuck themselves.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But now the Chateau des ducs de Bretagne history museum in Nantes has finally opened its blockbuster exhibition on Genghis Khan and the Mongol empire, with large crowds queueing to see hundreds of objects that have never been shown in Europe, some dug up by archaeologists only three years ago.

    Crucially, the exhibition seeks to look beyond the cinematic cliches of bloodthirsty warriors to the wider-ranging and geopolitically relevant lessons of the expansive Mongol empire through the 13th and 14th centuries, from climate change to pandemics, cartography and science.

    The Nantes museum pulled the plug and refused the demands, saying Chinese authorities wanted “elements of biased rewriting of Mongol culture in favour of a new national narrative”.

    The new show, which features more than 400 pieces including helmets, fabrics, ceramics and paper money, has instead gone ahead in collaboration with museums in Mongolia, the landlocked country between Russia and China.

    Bertrand Guillet, the director of the Chateau des ducs de Bretagne and Nantes history museum, and general curator of the show, said: “What seemed important when we launched this project six years ago was to go beyond the figure of Genghis Kahn, who is known in slightly vulgar terms as a bloody tyrant.

    “The Mongol empire was gigantic and there are echoes of its political and territorial questions today in the contemporary world: the relationship of China and Russia, what happens in Iran, in central Europe.”


    The original article contains 669 words, the summary contains 236 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!