• AVincentInSpace
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you propose, then, that everyone should be allowed to do as they please with absolutely zero rules?

        • AVincentInSpace
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Forgive me for assuming you considered violence to be bad.

          Since we’ve presupposed that all authority must in some way stem from the threat of violence, a hatred for violence cannot exist without a hatred for authority.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You have not quoted me once, you’ve projected your feelings into my statements and yet cannot explain which one you’re deriving your flawed opinion of me from.

            • AVincentInSpace
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This thread started because you asked someone to name a single nonviolent revolution. Such a thing cannot possibly exist, especially considering your inexplicably broad definition of that word.

              You cannot seriously equate shooting someone with taking a child’s dessert away, simply because you consider them both to be violence. Considering this I’m a bit confused as to your point.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That was my point.

                Point to where I ever said or implied such a thing, please you don’t actually have a point without a quote you can reference.

                • AVincentInSpace
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So you aren’t presenting an opinion and your intent with this discussion was just to stir the pot for no reason.

                  Good to know I’m talking to a troll. Have a nice life.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I provided a statement of fact, if that’s stirring the pot to you then consider it stirred.

                    Not at all, I’ve responded in good faith, why you’re upset is beyond me.