• unfreeradical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There is no natural distribution of any social role. A distribution is determined socially.

      Further, I already addressed your conflation of occurrence within a population for a skill versus its intrinsic attributes.

        • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Nature is that which occurs independent from the particular intentions of individuals or the particular configuration of society.

          Human societies occur within nature. We utilize and transform facets of nature toward our needs and ends. That which we create or produce is not natural.

          In various societies, members tend to express different behaviors, are subjected to different experiences, and have different roles and relationships.

          At any rate, the distinction is not required in the immediate context. I am now repeating for the third time that the distribution of an item or class of item within a system is not the same as its intrinsic attributes.

            • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I invoked the term originally, and later clarified the meaning, which is not in my experience controversial.

              How do you understand nature?

              • curiousaur@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You did not answer my question. You gave a definition of natural. Please explain why you get to define it.

                • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  As explained, I clarified the sense for which I invoked the term.

                  Beyond seeking such an answer, your question is not particularly coherent. No right is being asserted.

                  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nothing that you’ve written has been remotely coherent, it’s comical that you’d even use that word.

                    Have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness by chance? Do you ever hear voices or feel intrusive thoughts?