- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon is at least a modest victory for special counsel Jack Smith’s team, which had vigorously rejected efforts to push off the trial beyond its scheduled start date of May 20, 2024. Trump’s lawyers had argued that they needed more time to review the large trove of evidence with which they’d been presented and cited scheduling challenges resulting from the other legal cases against Trump, including three additional criminal prosecutions for which he is awaiting trial.
Unfortunately I don’t believe this is the case. What statute do you believe does this?
Source
It’s in subsection (b).
Thanks for the link.
Long story short, the cotus defines who can be president, not congress. So for that to ban him from that office, it would require a constitutional amendment.
Although I probably shouldn’t have said statute.
deleted by creator