• ampersandrew@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Borrowing money was cheap until it wasn’t. When they bought the old Eidos stuff, everyone thought Square Enix was taking crazy pills. Now, given that everyone’s cutting back right now, it looks more like they knew something Embracer didn’t.

    • SpitfireA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wasn’t Embracer depending on a huge cash deal with the Saudis that fell through? Likely had an impact.

      • nromdotcom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think regardless of that deal, they were already on the debt-go-round for long enough it would’ve caught up to them eventually. I can’t imagine this was gonna be “one last job then we go clean.” The market would continue to demand more and faster growth until they hit the wall one way or the other.

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly don’t think anyone was taken back by Eidos being sold off. The biggest mess Square Enix did was let IOI go while putting out The Quiet Man. Hitman 2? No! The Quiet Man, one of the worst games of the decade, YES! MORE PLEASE! Eidos hadn’t made a great game in a while but IOI had just put out a rather successful Hitman 1 season with large seasonal plans to keep it going. Now they are working on a James Bond game that everyone is excited about and Square is looking like an idiot. While Eidos will probably flop and flounder until they can get back their roots and build something substantial.

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People were taken aback by how little they sold for. IO Interactive bought themselves back from Square Enix some time ago.