• FaeDrifter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, we should own those dirty communist propagandists by housing every homeless person.

      The commies will be sooo owned if we do that.

        • ahnesampo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Finland has a housing first policy. The homeless often have multiple problems that prevent them from getting a home the normal way (e.g. drug problems that cause them to get evicted). Instead of insisting people get better while homeless, they’re given homes first and treatment for their other problems after. This coupled with welfare transfers that ensure you never end up homeless just because of lack of money leads to low homeless numbers.

        • Cowbee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, Finland does this precisely by rejecting Capitalism and giving homeless people homes. This is not a Capitalistic solution.

          I get what you’re saying, you can have a majority Capitalist society and still solve homelessness, but the answer will never be Capitalism.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Finland’s version of capitalism is in another universe compared to North American capitalism. Finland had UBI, rehabilitation first prisons, housing is treated more as a human right. Socialism doesn’t mean the abolition of commerce, it just removes the predatory hoodwink from the equation.

      • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Social democrats*

        It’s like communism but it works, and you don’t even have to kill minorities like you do on communism.

        • Cowbee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why does Communism necessitate killing minorities, and why are you assuming Social Democracies haven’t killed minorities?

          Do you think tools have a mystical property that requires the owners to turn evil if they are collectively owned, rather than privately?

          • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why does Communism necessitate killing minorities, and why are you assuming Social Democracies haven’t killed minorities?

            Good question, let’s hope you are able to have a civil conversation!

            First of all, every communist regime has systemically killed off their minorities. Social democrat governments haven’t. I hope that clears it up. If you come across social democratic governments systematically killing minorities, let me know though.

            Do you think tools have a mystical property that requires the owners to turn evil if they are collectively owned, rather than privately?

            Like I said earlier, the underlying economic model under the fascism is irrelevant to the millions of minorities having being killed by communist regimes.

            • Cowbee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Every country has systemically killed off minorities.

              Show me exactly where the mystical property of tools comes in, where collective ownership turns people evil. If you can’t, then Communism does not necessitate genocide.

              It’s that simple.

              • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Every country had systemically killed off minorities.

                Did I say talk about countries or governments? Keep it on topic

                If you can’t, then Communism does not necessitate genocide.

                Again, I don’t support transphobia, I just so happen to support communism which is a form of fascism which historically has systematically slaughtered transgendered people :)

                Fuck you fascist.

                • Cowbee@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Ah, you’re a troll, checks out. For your information, the Weimar Republic was a failing Social Democracy that led to Nazi Germany, which was responsible for the Holocaust. Even Social Democracy isn’t a perfectly innocent system, nor can anyone truthfully say that unrelated systems necessitate the presence of each other.

                  I support collective ownership of the Means of Production, which will eventually lead to a Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society. I don’t particularly subscribe to any particular flavor of leftism, as each country will get there a different way. As such, I’m simply a leftist. Decentralization, equality, and Democracy are critical to human happiness, which will necessitate trans liberation. To call me transphobic is projection.

                  All in all, you’re nothing more than a troll who believes tools have mystical qualities that necessitate genocide if people share them. You can’t actually logically prove this point so you dodge and resort to calling me a transphobic fascist, despite being the opposite.

                  There’s no use in continuing this convo, you asked me to be civil and yet you immediately out yourself as a troll and spew slander.

                  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    The Weimar Republic was also deeply economically fucked because of repayments made to the Allies post WW1. There’s a little bit of history you’re casually ignoring. It wasn’t a systemic failure of “social democracy”.

                  • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah, you’re a troll, checks out

                    Lost a convo -> ah you’re a troll haha. Classic dodge.

                    Weimar Republic was a failing Social Democracy that led to Nazi Germany, which was responsible for the Holocaust.

                    And the fish that decided to walk on land was responsible for 9/11. What the fuck are you on about?

                    I support collective ownership of the Means of Production, which will eventually lead to a Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society.

                    Yet in reality it only eventually has lead to genocide. Good going, I’m sure it’ll work the next time around. All you transfolk you’re good, we pinky promise not to kill you this time around :)

                    Still wont (or can’t?) be civil, tries to dodge responsibility and shows 0 sympathy for the victims of communism. Textbook fascist.

            • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              At what point was there a communist country on Earth and not just a fascist dictatorship calling itself communist? When did the proles have their revolution and create government?

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          you don’t even have to kill minorities like you do on communism.

          TIL… Derek Chauvin is really a communist.

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              TIL… Derek Chauvin is a fascist. But also a communist. No, a fascist. But also… a communist.

              • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you unaware that fascism is an umbrella term for many things such as communism and national socialism? I mean I know you’d rather suppress that fact but still, quite delusional

                • masquenox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  TIL… serving capitalism makes you communist.

                  Do tell… do you also apply this “logic-that-must-be-good-because-I-pulled-it-out-of-my-ass” in other parts of your life?

                  • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nah. I’m an antifascist. If something looks like a fascist and acts like a fascist it is fascist. It’s not my fault every communist regime is fascist. Differences in the economic model underneath is irrelevant to the minorities being slaughtered. Communism is intrinsically transphobic