• KeriKitty (They(/It))
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Muffin encryption here to save us from the corpos! They can’t hurt us if they can’t access their muffins! And are getting attacked by an army of trans sharks!

        Okay, I’ll stop playing with your name and instance name now! skitters away goofily

        Edit: People are downvoting me because they are bad people and like to watch babies cry or something like that. That is 100% the factual reason they are doing this.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Still more focused on results than profits tho, and more accountable

        • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’d rather have a soulless government branch that actually fucks me over than a soulless corporation that fucks me over. At least the former tends to pay more and have better job security.

        • MissJinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not in my experience. Idk how it works in the US but as a consultant I worked in public companies around the world and dude, those are the worst. They will need 2/3 people to do the job of 1 because they don’t work like private companies and don’t usually fire people as fast if they don’t have an acceptable performance. A lot of people doing nothing and 1/2 guys keeping everything running. Mind you, with public money

    • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      or worse, communism

      I would have thought most people who hate private companies would be pretty keen for communism

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference being reality and utopian fantasy.

        It’s like people who say equality is best today despite the very real and present need for equity.

        They’re very real and perfectly fine concepts on paper. But it’s a massive difference between how it translates to reality on paper and how it actually manifests when filtered through the human condition.

        Kinda like Libertarianism. Trickle down economics. Live and let live. Personal freedoms. Communism.

        Turns out reality isn’t so easily fit in such neat little boxes to cover the gamut of how every human acts and reacts.

    • Alex@feddit.ro
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get why so many people on Lemmy are straight-up communists. I’m left-leaning myself, but actual communism has always ended in a totalitarian dictatorship. Literally 1984

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        there are no examples of “actual” communism.

        so you don’t know what you are talking about.

        and this is is not some no true Scots an argument, if you look at how they worked the proletariat didn’t control the means of production, what happened was that the state took control so it was more like state capitalism, much like China is now.

        The wealth transfer didn’t happen from the burgois/capitalists to the workers but to the ruling party,that’s how you got wealthy in those states you became a party man.

        in short those countries were about as communist as Nazis were socialist

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy was founded by a Communist, and Communism in theory is focused on creating a Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society via Worker ownership of the means of production. It’s fairly easy to see why Lemmy, a platform built on decentralization and a rejection of the profit motive, appeals to leftists like Communists.

        Additionally, most Communists practice Materialism, and analyze historical events and structures on the basis of their material conditions. Rather than believing tools have mystical properties that corrupt the minds of those that collectively own them, they look at why historical examples of Socialism have turned out the way they did, and seek to learn from them.

        Nobody in any serious number seriously wants a dictatorship with an absolute state.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no arguing about communism on Lemmy. I already know what that other reply says and I only read half of the first sentence.

    • qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      …but Apple is a publicly traded company.

      I feel like one of us got whooshed, though I’m not entirely sure who.

        • qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure. But that’s unrelated; Apple is a publicly traded (“public”) company. IKEA, for example, is a privately funded (“private”) company. Being largely proprietary is separate from the ownership structure…

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Please do not lecture me on public vs private companies lmfao. That was the most condescending comment I’ve seen in a while. This is a joke post, and we were making little asides. You can allow a little loose interpretation in service of a joke.