• verysoft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah if you just watch the big players’ streams from E3 then I can see the similarities.

    Games don’t need awards, it’s just all subjective anyway and just gives the cringe oscars vibe of ‘patting ourselves on the back’. You know if a game is good by it’s player reviews and how many friends have told you to play it etc, we don’t need a random set of judges deciding for us behind the scenes what the best games are.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, The Game Awards are voted for by the players, not some panel of industry suits.

      • verysoft@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, the players choose the player’s choice winner and contribute only 10% towards the actual winners.

        The games are nominated by a committee, the committee of ‘game news organisations’ is chosen by the ‘advisory board’ of the game awards, the board consists of Activision Blizzard, Ubisoft, EA, Sony, Microsoft, Valve, Nintendo, Tencent, AMD, Riot Games, Rockstar Games, Epic Games and for some reason Kojima Productions. So they have the choice to pick their favourable ‘news’ outlets, which in turn will pick the nominees and the winners of the awards. There’s a lot of room for bullshittery to happen and with some past winners/nominees, I wouldn’t doubt there has been.