• CarbonIceDragon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair on the deer, no natural predator is going to be chasing them at that kind of speed, so their instincts have no reason to be adapted to understanding objects moving that fast

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah dude, that don’t make no sense. Do animals only ever run from predators? Do they not have an instinct to avoid colliding with objects? Do they simply let 2 tons of steel smash into them just because it doesn’t look like anything they know that would want to eat them?

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      no natural predator is going to be chasing them at that kind of speed, so their instincts have no reason to be adapted

      Nonsense. Deer, including wild deer, live in parts of the world where that threat exists.

      Adaptation being beneficial for survival is about what IS, not only what’s natural. As far as reasons go, survival is kind of a big one for “instincts to be adapted”.

      • CarbonIceDragon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but evolution takes a long time and cars have been a common enough threat to potentially cause selection pressure for what, a century or so maybe?