EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

    • mriormro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Disbelief≠skepticism

      There are people in the comments denying literal, established, concrete facts. That’s not questioning anything,; that’s ignorance at best and malevolence at worst.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You decide what’s fact. Everything you ever thought you knew is stuff someone told you and you believed it based on their presentation. You’ve never seen evidence. You’ve seen them telling you there’s evidence.

        • tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Try doing some simple physics experiments with pendulum and stuff. It is quite simple to set up and will make you use many different physics concepts.

          For quantum mechanics, I suggest diffraction and the double slit experiment that are quite easy to do with a cheap laser pointer.

          That way you can rediscover scientific models yourself!

          If you are not willing to try it, then you don’t really have legitimacy criticizing thé work of scientists.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m not criticizing work so much as all the things where the claim work is done but wasn’t.

            As a flow artist, I understand pendulums more than most. I heckin live pendulums! I play with them every day!

            Science is good. Science publishing is out of hand.

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          What if you’re doing the research real-time? What if you, yourself, have done the experiments which logically are evidence? There are a lot of things you can scientifically prove yourself. And there are a lot of phenomena you can mathematically prove without even doing the experiments, although you have to try to mitigate or account for chaos / the specific environment you’re working with.

          Conspiracy bullshit like “you haven’t seen the scientific evidence so it might just all be made up by so-called scientists” is garbage. You are a nut if you think that. It is on the same level as flat-earthers and anti-vaxxers.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh yeah, I’m not against the idea of science. Doing it yourself from the ground up is pretty solid. All of your own experiences are at the very least valid as you experienced them.

            If you can believe the scale of vote fraud Trump pulled off, you can believe that textbooks are often written with an interest in influencing our young. I’m mostly against history as it’s taught. It’s written by the victors and so much of it comes off as fables and allegories to keep people in line.