The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office – a move that will likely delay his trial.

The court did not explain its reasoning and there were no noted dissents.

The court’s decision is a major blow to Smith, who made an extraordinary gamble when he asked the justices to take the rare step of skipping a federal appeals court and quickly deciding a fundamental issue in his election subversion criminal case against Trump.

Both sides will still have the option of appealing an eventual ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals up to the high court, but the court’s move is a major victory for Trump, whose strategy of delay in the criminal case included mounting a protracted fight over the immunity question, which must be settled before his case goes to trial.

  • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    While I don’t disagree that SCOTUS might very well get around to giving Trump a get out of jail free card, they haven’t acted inappropriately yet. It isn’t the normal flow for this appeal to immediately go to SCOTUS; the expected result for such an attempt is denial.

    • ferralcat@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’ve taken things yo faster before when there is a time imperative to do so. There is here. They’re breaking their own precedent.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s delaying , and aiding Trump’s bullshit. Prosecutors are going to spend months of process now, for the same question to inevitably hit SC’s desk, before Smith can loop back to Trump in time to start his trial 60 odd days before the elections, when he’ll get to whine and complain that trials are interfering with his candidacy. What an infuriatingly corrupt institution.

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s a process, and the DC circuit is the next stop. Why didn’t the liberal justices dissent? This is fairly standard.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yeah, keep that process in mind after Trump wins 2024, pardons himself and carries on with this concept of ironclad immunity for the presidential office. I’m sure it will be a real comfort knowing we did everything we could except expedit this incredibly exceptional circumstance.

          I understand the wheels of justice grind slow, and so does trump. He’s weaponizing and banking on this for his escape maneuver, and that alone should put this case to priority #1.

          Edit: and that’s before we even consider his defense: “maybe I’m immune from crimes committed during office, forever?” is not how this concept has ever been interpreted. It’s a ridiculous proposal with a simple response.