• LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whoa well for once I feel like a real valid human because everything OP suggested, my android phone settings look exactly as he showed, and he taught me something new ❤️

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, they are all slightly different on my phones, yet they look very similar to OPs. For example, on my Samsung and Honor the switch for selfie camera disappears in the Pro mode, while in OPs it’s still present. On my Samsung, the shutter speed setting has just an icon and no label, but on the Honor it has no icon, but the label “S”

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they support raw camera capture then they either have settings like that or you can install an app that has settings like that.

    • Interstellar_1OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recommend the app ProCamX for those who don’t have Pro settings in their android phone

  • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This image took so long to load someone got pregnant and gave birth to a healthy baby girl named Olivia. Send flowers.

  • TalesFromTheKitchen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you expect from a sensor the size of a lentil. It’s always a compromise. Even if you shoot in manual or pro mode there is so much processing going on behind the scenes with upscaling and sharpening. Zoom in and you’ll see the mess. I mean smartphone cameras are awesome to quickly get a shot but never look as good as a dedicated camera.

      • TalesFromTheKitchen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah raw is another option to fix the images up with proper color correction and white balance. But even with raw you can’t circumvent the processing done on the chip. I guess I just don’t like the denoising algorithm and the upscaling. It looks muddy and like watercolor closeup, especially when you develop the images in large formats. But I too don’t always want to carry my DSLR everywhere with two lenses and a batterypack.

        • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apps like OpenCamera on Android let you disable (most of) the post processing, and shoot as closely to the raw, physical capabilities of the camera as possible.

          You’ll never get rid of the watercolor look completely, but you can do a lot to make the photos look fairly decent, I’d say.

          Always depends on what you need them for, though. As you say, shots from a phone are less than ideal for large formats that bring out all the little artifacts.

      • Trollception@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The close ones kinda suck too. There is no really dof and the detail isnt there. That said if your only sharing to social media it can sometimes be hard to tell.

  • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now if I could have a camera app that has proper manual settings, can use both my phones lenses but isn’t Gcam…

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s always been an issue with point-and-shoot cameras, even the analog ones, for about half a century. You trade picture quality for ease of use.

  • kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    also take your photos in square mode on most cameras wide/tall mode is just the cropped/zoomed in version of square so you’ll lose some detail there

    you can always crop after the fact if you want a specific framing

  • umbraroze@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vast majority of times, when a smartphone camera turns the gorgeous view you saw into a “joyless fucking nihilist” situation, it either fucked up the exposure somehow or picked the wrong white balance mode. Both of those can be somewhat remedied in post (though, especially as far as bad exposure goes, you can’t always recover all the detail). I’ve taken a look at a bunch of crappy cellphone/cheap digital camera photography of mine (everything from recent stuff to, like, 15 years ago) and something as simple and basic as curves adjustment and white balance adjustment tools usually go a long way to fix things.

  • wazzupdog@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every one of my phones’ cameras have always been set to pro mode(since it was actually useful) my LG G5 and V20 were great at taking advantage of the pro mode. Now I use an Asus Zenfone 9, pro mode is actually amazing, and the physical final makes low light shots at 1 sec+ exposure much easier. The pixel line pretends to have the “best camera” but the sensor is actually pretty meh and relies too much on “ai” post-processing. I have seen first hand that there are better cameras on phones than any Samsung/pixel phone. If a camera needs post processing it’s not a good camera.