_number8_@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 11 months agoWhy do we have an internal monologue?message-squaremessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1214arrow-down1message-squareWhy do we have an internal monologue?_number8_@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square133fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarenaharin@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up23·edit-211 months agoIn the article they bring up many questionable aspects of this idea, which also seems to lack in scientific support. And so the bicameral mind remains a highly controversial idea
minus-squareadam_y@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·11 months agoAbsolutely. I’m no expert, and since there weren’t any studies performed on people from that era, I’d expect it to be taken as a theory rather than a fact.
minus-squareberkeleyblue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·10 months agoHypothesis not Theory
minus-squareadam_y@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·10 months agoPedantry, not conversation. Still, you are correct.
In the article they bring up many questionable aspects of this idea, which also seems to lack in scientific support.
Absolutely. I’m no expert, and since there weren’t any studies performed on people from that era, I’d expect it to be taken as a theory rather than a fact.
Hypothesis not Theory
Pedantry, not conversation.
Still, you are correct.