• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    this is the funnniest thing since he was forced to buy it. accidentally outing his own bots because billioonaire cant pay his bills.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What? This has nothing to do with his finances? Where did you get that from?

      The bots got outed because they all gave the ChatGPT response to not answering a topic.

      • Ace0fBlades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        He’s attempting to make money by increasing the value of twitter to advertisers by using bots.

        The fact that the bots are poorly implemented is icing on the cake

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          The article isn’t saying that Musk is behind the bots.

          The article is making fun of him for waving his opportunity to do due diligence before the purchase and being stuck with all the bots.

          • pacoo2454@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            10 months ago

            Of course that’s what the article is saying.

            “Bluesky users are roasting Elon Musk for his freshly exposed blue-checked bot army of fake Xitheads.”

            “Fast forward a year and it appears Xitter, the steaming remains of Twitter, is using bots to generate Tweets and look bigger.”

            • Windex007@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Is the author actually accusing the company itself of running the bots in that sentence? The more I read it the more it hurts my brain. The more times I read this article my brain just hurts more and more. They’re not even attempting to explain, let alone justify, this assertion.

              • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It wouldn’t be the 1st platform to try and use bots to boost numbers, except it is usually in the beginning when trying to reach that critical tipping point mass that brings people organically. This would be to make the ship look less underwater to save face (and possibly stop the whole platform imploding).

                Edit - Also it very much says they believe Musk is running the bots in this sentence - “Fast forward a year and it appears Xitter, the steaming remains of Twitter, is using bots to generate Tweets and look bigger.”

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Adding to that, the idea of the check mark used to be to ensure you were talking to who you thought it was. Now bots are verified.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I am here to profess my eternal and undying love for this description

    Xitter, the steaming remains of Twitter

    • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      it’s what elon deserves though. i don’t want to see an actual picture of his ugly face.

  • macattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Great to hear. Preferably from a more neutral source next time. Hard to take it at their word when it’s so editorialized and filled w/ name-calling. And I say this as someone who probably would end up on a watch list if I gave my personal opinion of Elon

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I agree , the source is doubtfull. And about Musk… we should cut his head without ceremony and ditch it in a sewer… I think there is a lot of us on that watchlist

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Impossible nowadays to get unbiased news. For instance, despite Reuters excellence in journalism awards, people still love sharing their Daily Mail and Mother Jones.

    • mPony@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      well the artwork undeniably is.
      but the point stands: obvious Xitter bot army is obvious.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    He could stand in the middle of fifth avenune and shoot a guy in the face and the bots would never leave Xitter

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wouldn’t surprise me if the calls were coming from inside. What’s Twitter’s Grok chatbot used for these days?