What opinion just makes you look like you aged 30 years

    • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the content on my feed should come from unpersonalized suggestions, or the communities i choose to follow. 👍

    • Leigh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like that Lemmy and Masto don’t have those fucking algorithms. It’s a relief.

      • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is your opinion on Bluesky? Their default feed is chronological, but they do have algorithms. They’re actually moving towards custom algorithms, so you can build your own or use someone else’s, delete, pin, reorder them. It’s like different feeds. I like that implementation personally.

        • Leigh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I couldn’t say, they’re closed to new users. I’ve been on the wait list for a long time, but no joy.

          I’m skeptical that it ultimately won’t just turn into Twitter 2.0

          • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually, the waitlist takes way too much time. I just went on Twitter and found a couple of people with invites. I don’t have one yet, but would you want one when I do?

            • Leigh@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, I’ll give it a go, thank you for thinking of me. The whole bullshit with Twitter and now Reddit has me feeling pretty burned on corporate-owned social media, so I’m likely to stick with federated things like Masto, Lemmy, etc., but I’ll give it a go. I am curious about it. I wonder why they’re leaning so hard on the waitlist thing? They’re losing precious adoption time, as people are right now wanting to move away from Twitter. Or rather, they have been wanting that for months, so there may already be a lot of lost opportunity re: user attention or interest.

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it has its place but it should absolutely be optional. Yeah they suck but the YouTube algorithm is responsible for like 70% of my knowledge base.

      • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like algorithms when done well are amazing. Like, the YouTube Music algorithm is so great for music, I just start playing a song and it takes it from there. Unlike Spotify, which has gone downhill these days, I never feel the need to skip a song on YTM.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to be mad at algorythms suggesting things that is disliked. But then I realised that it would be rather scary if they were right.

    • TauZero@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never have I ever benefited from Google or Amazon or anyone changing my search string for me. Even if I do misspell something, I’m gonna click on the “did you mean x instead?” link myself, because I don’t trust the 50/50 mixed results anyway. But 90% of the time I’m gonna be immediately scrambling to put the double quotes back in, which it’s also gonna ignore half the time.

    • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some alternative frontends resolve this. Invidious for example is a youtube front end. There are public instances. Most popular sites have them.