• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m curious about the downvote. What did I say that was objectionable? Valve haven’t sent a cease and desist because of an infringement against themselves, they’ve sent a cease and desist on behalf of Nintendo, apparently without prompt from Nintendo. That’s bullshit.

    Edit: Lmfao lazy lurkers downvoting without engaging… Put your balls on the table and say something.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah sure, but why is Valve defending Nintendo’s IP? That’s my issue here.

        • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are not defending Nintendo’s IP, they are worried about having their IP associated with proprietary Nintendo libraries. They also didn’t send a cease and desist but reached out to him directly and asked him to take it down.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They also didn’t send a cease and desist but reached out to him directly and asked him to take it down.

            You’re right, and I should have double checked and worded it better. However, for all intents and purposes, politely asking him to take it down is the same as a cease and desist.

            they are worried about having their IP associated with proprietary Nintendo libraries.

            That is indeed apparent, however I still don’t get it. What do they hope to gain from currying favour from Nintendo? They don’t sell Nintendo games on Steam, and doing so is a pipe dream (lol sleepy Mario).

            • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              politely asking him to take it down is the same as a cease and desist.

              The result is the same but there’s a huge difference between getting legally threatened by a big company and being asked nicely.

              What do they hope to gain from currying favour from Nintendo?

              The knowledge of having zero chance to be sued by Nintendo.

              • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The result is the same but there’s a huge difference between getting legally threatened by a big company and being asked nicely.

                Not really. Asking nicely can easily be a veiled threat.

                The knowledge of having zero chance to be sued by Nintendo.

                But that’s an excessively risk averse position to take. It doesn’t even really fit for Valve, although it’s common with lawyers. Hence why I don’t think Valve has the right lawyers for their ethos.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re defending their IP.

          They’re really wildly permissive with their IP, but combining it with other people’s you also don’t own is very obviously over the line.