• Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    it’s just about reading their implementation and providing an alternative implementation that doesn’t copy code…

    That sounds difficult though. Didn’t companies have to set up ethics walls to protect against lawsuits for things like that?

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      11 months ago

      Didn’t companies have to set up ethics walls to protect against lawsuits for things like that?

      What are you talking about? There’s copyright infringement that when you copy the leaked Windows source code into something like Wine or ReactOS and then there’s reading it to understand what Microsoft did and coming up with an alternative implementation that will provide a compatible API for programs to use. There’s no “gray zone” or ethical BS - it’s either copied or not.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        What are you talking about?

        Ah the term I was looking for was “clean room”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design

        See the bit about examples and IBM. While you could probably look, the easiest way to defend against a giant tech company’s legal team is to do the clean room setup