• ObsidianBlk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The sad thing is you’re technically correct only because it’s people with a similar mindset to you on the matter that perpetuate this idea.

        • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, it’s technically correct because the math just doesn’t work in favor of third parties. That can change, but you have to put in a lot more effort than just voting at every opportunity.

    • centof@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure you can, but what you can do is irrelevant. Even if you do it is guaranteed not to have a say nationally because of our first past the post voting system locks out any competition. You have 2 meaningful choices, anything else is locked out by our voting system and rendered non meaningful.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        With the right candidate you could trick both major parties into secretly funding them as a spoiler candidate for the other party. You just need to say things that make headlines that people will engage with and come up with three word zingers that people will chant. Just say ambiguous shit and people will interpret it however they want to. There’s people winning elections as libertarians, so it’s totally possible with a more appealing platform.