Teachers describe a deterioration in behaviour and attitudes that has proved to be fertile terrain for misogynistic influencers

“As soon as I mention feminism, you can feel the shift in the room; they’re shuffling in their seats.” Mike Nicholson holds workshops with teenage boys about the challenges of impending manhood. Standing up for the sisterhood, it seems, is the last thing on their minds.

When Nicholson says he is a feminist himself, “I can see them look at me, like, ‘I used to like you.’”

Once Nicholson, whose programme is called Progressive Masculinity, unpacks the fact that feminism means equal rights and opportunities for women, many of the boys with whom he works are won over.

“A lot of it is bred from misunderstanding and how the word is smeared,” he says.

But he is battling against what he calls a “dominance-based model” of masculinity. “These old-fashioned, regressive ideas are having a renaissance, through your masculinity influencers – your grifters, like Andrew Tate.”

    • AVincentInSpace
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not if algorithmic feeds are defined as ones that show individualized feeds to each user, like I said in my comment

          • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, the definition in the law would have to be based on what constitutes an algorithm. That’s what I meant, doofus

            • AVincentInSpace
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              What specific algorithms the law applies to does not have to be all pieces of code that could be conceivably classed as an “algorithm”. The law can use a different word if it makes you feel better