Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoThey must have had great chemistry togethersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imageThey must have had great chemistry togethersh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down15·edit-26 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down2·9 months ago a lemmy.ml admin Oh, this all makes sense now.
minus-squaregun@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·9 months agoInclusive for me but not for thee
minus-squareObi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·9 months agoRarely see it spelled out that clearly, I think that’s a huge issue with modern “progressivism”.
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoProgressivism has no inherent need to be all-encompassing. In fact, keeping certain groups *cough conservatives cough* not included is an essential part of successful progressivism.
minus-squareObi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoYou’re referring to the tolerance paradox, and I completely agree with that, but I don’t think that’s what happened here.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-26 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareeltimablo@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoYou, for one. I imagine that’s why you posted it in the first place.
minus-squarebane_killgrind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·9 months agoSo implying that name by marriage still implies ownership, excludes me, a man that wants to fly the banner of his wife’s clan. You aren’t supporting your “different priorities” very well.
Removed by mod
Oh, this all makes sense now.
Inclusive for me but not for thee
Rarely see it spelled out that clearly, I think that’s a huge issue with modern “progressivism”.
Progressivism has no inherent need to be all-encompassing. In fact, keeping certain groups *cough conservatives cough* not included is an essential part of successful progressivism.
You’re referring to the tolerance paradox, and I completely agree with that, but I don’t think that’s what happened here.
Removed by mod
You, for one. I imagine that’s why you posted it in the first place.
So implying that name by marriage still implies ownership, excludes me, a man that wants to fly the banner of his wife’s clan.
You aren’t supporting your “different priorities” very well.