Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoGoogle and Mozilla don’t like Apple’s new iOS browser rulesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1296arrow-down15cross-posted to: informatica@feddit.ittechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1291arrow-down1external-linkGoogle and Mozilla don’t like Apple’s new iOS browser rulesarstechnica.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: informatica@feddit.ittechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squaregraylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·11 months agoThat’s not what the lawsuit is about. Google made backdoor deals to pay developers to release on the play store instead of their own 3rd party app store. They were found at fault for anti-competitive behavior.
minus-squareFlipper@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·11 months agoThat’s a pot calling a kettle black. Epic is doing the same thing with there store.
minus-squaredai@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoBut they do freely allow it, grab an APK from F-Droid and install it.
minus-squaredai@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-211 months agoYou posed a question about Google policing sideloading, then posted an article that has nothing to do with google policing side loading. 🤷♂️
That’s not what the lawsuit is about. Google made backdoor deals to pay developers to release on the play store instead of their own 3rd party app store. They were found at fault for anti-competitive behavior.
That’s a pot calling a kettle black. Epic is doing the same thing with there store.
deleted by creator
But they do freely allow it, grab an APK from F-Droid and install it.
You posed a question about Google policing sideloading, then posted an article that has nothing to do with google policing side loading.
🤷♂️