• aubertlone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      They didn’t, at least not in what I read.

      They’re just outlining how stupid the argument is.

    • derfunkatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The larger context of why anyone is talking about what is sung at the Super Bowl should have been enough of a set up, but apparently not.

      This entire stunt is predicated on the right’s frustration that they couldn’t do anything about black athletes and allies being disrespectful during the National Anthem (a legally defined song with etiquette spelled out in the US legal code), which is protected speech.

      Now, in my opinion, they have a Super Bowl to posture about eight months before a presidential election. They want sound bites and over-the-top reactions so that they can paint themselves the victims of a hypocritical, leftist, anti-freedom conspiratorial media machine. This part of that “projection” plank in the modern GOP.

      My original post was simply outlining that no matter how you slice it, there is nothing to be mad about them “protesting” the Black National Anthem. I added in a rhetorical refrain to drive home the point while beating a dead horse for effect.

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      A warning to anyone coming across this after the fact like I am : do not enter the comments below. There is nothing of value here. Just block this user and move on for the sake of your own sanity, they are a known troll and intentionally stupid.