• @Misconduct@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    41
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    A long long LOOOONG time ago I tried to screenshot a video in windows media player and the screenshot still changed when I moved or played the video. I often wonder if that was a fever dream or just some weird shit that was happening with really early tech. I remember being so mad because I just wanted a screenshot of a scene in the video and it wouldn’t work lol

    • @elvith@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      33
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Not a fever dream, I remember this, too. You basically got a “transparent” image through which you could see the rendered live (or game, as it happened with those, too). As soon as you closed the video player/game, or saved and reloaded the image, the effect was gone and you were stuck with a… I think it was just a black image?

        • @elvith@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          95 months ago

          Back then, there was less hardware acceleration for the regular desktop stuff. Probably it just copied the data from the software rendering, and there it just defined that this part of the screen was hardware accelerated and this region pointed to vram instead of regular RAM.

            • @elvith@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              I remember this from Win 95 and Win 98, maybe even XP? You usually had a GPU, but they were more simple than today’s GPUs. Oftentimes they were on-board (in contrast to today’s iGPUs that are part of the processor, not part of the mainboard).

              In the very early times you had 3D cards like the 3Dfx Vodoo cards. Those could only render 3D. Your desktop and other programs were still rendered by your normal GPU or on-board graphics card. They did only render 3D. You had to put a small cable from the output of your regular GPU to your 3D card’s input and then plug you monitor into the 3D card. While you didn’t do 3D, the 3Dfx Vodoo would just output everything it received from your regular GPU. When you played a game, it would output whatever it rendered instead.

    • @zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 months ago

      IIRC media players used to do something like a green screen where they draw a rectangle of a certain color and then a separate process would decode the video and display it over the colored rectangle. So taking a screenshot of the media player would capture the colored rectangle and it’d also be targeted by the video renderer.

    • @lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      145 months ago

      This is real. I first was mad too, but than I copied it into paint, made some kind of clipart TV around it, and made it my desktop background. After that I could open VLC, move the window into the right spot and minimize it. This was soo cool.

      • @AVincentInSpace
        link
        English
        35 months ago

        You’ve activated my hyperanalytical brain. I have to know exactly how that worked

        • @lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          I don’t know the exact technicalities but you can think of it as there is a color that’s “VLC video”, like a green screen. VLC itself consists of a window filled with this color and projects the video to the coordinates. Once you minimize the window, the video disappears, not because it isn’t projected anymore, but because there is no “projection surface”, except if the color happens to appear somewhere, be it paint or the background. I hope that makes it clear as far as I myself understand it.

          • @AVincentInSpace
            link
            English
            25 months ago

            Fascinating. Follow up question, did your computer have a second graphics card for 3D graphics/decoding video?

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    235 months ago

    How cool would it be if printers had a feature where they printed .gif pre-formatted as a flip-book?

    • @Aasikki@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      It’s crazy to think that oled indeed is paper thin, literally. I’m still wowed every time I disassemble an old screen from a device. It’s like, "that’s it? that thin piece of what looks like aluminium foil is the display? It’s crazy thin even together with the front glass. And I still have that reaction even though I know how the technology works.

  • @Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    205 months ago

    I once considered scanning a mirror so that I could make my background a mirror.

    I guess a perfect scanner could do that. But the piece of shit real world scanner my dad bought wouldn’t have managed it.

  • @SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    85 months ago

    I have started feeling a bit empathetic with age towards these people, even if this was probably a troll but to the people who don’t know how tech works it might as well be magic. Ignorance is bliss can also be applied here I guess.

    • @treesquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      Given that the tech they need to understand here is paper, empathy is hard and it’s just frustrating. Computers, complicated. Paper, extremely uncomplicated. This is just refusal to use the noodle.

  • @Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    75 months ago

    Yahoo answers:

    I’m worried about my small penis will it keep growing?

    I’m 13 so I’m hoping it will keep getting bigger but it’s only 9 inches long. Is there anything I can do to make it bigger?

    • @tpihkal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      I think my earliest handle was “here2help”; I must have been like 13-14. Although, I was wicked tech savvy for a kid in the late 90’s.