Memo details layoffs, "strategic corrections," and a desire for "trustworthy" AI.
    • deweydecibel@lemmy.worldEnglish
      211·
      9 months ago

      I don’t see them joining anything?

      I mean, let’s be real, what major function has Mozilla implemented into Firefox that hasn’t been opt-out? And no, UI doesn’t count, I’m talking features.

      The problem isn’t the existence of AI. The problem is the inescapably of it and how, under Microsoft or Google, it will harvest your data whether you like it or not. When you tell them “fuck off, leave me alone, and keep my words out of your AI’s mouth”, they’re not going to listen. Profit motive requires them to invade.

      Mozilla is a non-profit, and they’ve long been very good about letting you opt out things, and listening. I’m not worried about them putting AI into Firefox, because I can be reasonably sure it will be optional, in a way I know the others won’t.

      I’d rather they didn’t go chasing this car at all, to be honest, because they’re not likely to catch it, but whatever. They’re renewing focus on the browser and I’m taking that as a win.

      • daltotron@lemmy.worldEnglish
        31·
        9 months ago

        I can’t contest the first point cause I’m not a firefox junkie, so I won’t.

        What I will contest is that the existence of AI, or, deep learning, or LLMs, or neural networks, or matrix multiplication, or whatever type of shit they come up with next, I’ll contest that it isn’t problematic. I kind of think it is, inherently, I think it’s existence is not great. Mostly because it obfuscates, even internally, the processing of data, it obfuscates the inputs from the outputs, the works from the results. You can do that with regular programming just fine, just as you can do most of the shit that AI does with normal programming, like that guy who made a program that calculates the prices for japanese baked goods and also recognizes cancer, right. But I think AI is a step further than that, it obfuscates it more. I kind of am skeptical of it’s broad implementation.

        For trivial use cases, it’s kind of fine, but I think maybe use cases we might consider trivial, otherwise are kind of fucked, maybe. AI summary of an article? I dunno if that’s good. We might think, oh, this is kind of trivial because the user should just not really trust what the AI says, but, as with all technology, what if the user is an idiot and a moron? They might just use it to read the article for them, and then spout off whatever talking points and headlines it gives them. I can’t really think of a scenario where that’s actually a good thing, and it’s highly possible. It might make it easier to parse an article, like that, but I don’t think that’s actually a good or useful tool, it’s just presented a kind of illusion of utility, most especially because it was redundant (we could just write a summary and have it at the top of the article, like every article on the face of the earth), and it was totally beyond our control, at least, in most circumstances.

        Also, the Mozilla Foundation is nonprofit, but the Mozilla Corporation is not. The Foundation manages the Corp, which manages Firefox development. So depending on which one you’re referring to, it might be a non-profit, or it might not be. In any case, the nonprofit is a step removed from Firefox development, which I think is an important side-note, even if it’s not actually that relevant to whatever conversations about AI there might be.

        • mute@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          9 months ago

          Perhaps, comically, it is the perfect representation of the world as it is now: “knowledge” in people’s brains is created by consuming whatever source aligns with the beliefs that they think are theirs. No source or facts are required. Only the interpretation matters.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    971·
    9 months ago

    How about, and run with me on this, Mozilla stops trying to be Microsoft and Google and instead just provides the cleanest, most barebones-yet-privacy-oriented browser? Will they ever have market dominance? No, and they never will even with AI tools. Fuck AI and what it’s doing to the planet and fuck all of the capitalists enshittifying The Last Browser.

    We need a new Foundation willing to develop a fork.

  • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    593·
    9 months ago

    why the fuck would I need an AI in a browser? 0 fucks given for this “feature”. firefox is devolving into an edge.

    • red_pigeon@lemm.eeEnglish
      231·
      9 months ago

      Nowadays we are supposed to need AI everywhere. I’m waiting for my AI bidet so that I can chat with it when I do my business.

    • UnityDevice@startrek.websiteEnglish
      12·
      9 months ago

      You already have AI in Firefox - local translations for example. Developing local AI aligns perfectly well with Mozilla’s goals, but it seems people panic as soon as they see the two letters together.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7·
      9 months ago

      Desperate to gain marketshare, fucking samsung to apple. I hate it and I have no other options left after Firefox is enshittified

    • Flumpkin@slrpnk.netEnglish
      65·
      9 months ago

      Theoretically I can imagine AI in the browser to be awesome to combat AI on the web. Let the AI wars begin!

        • Flumpkin@slrpnk.netEnglish
          63·
          9 months ago

          I know there is currently a massive PR campaign for a power grab to consolidate control over AI software. They want to control the means of generation. Only MozillAI can save us from King GhAIdorah!

          Sorry I’m upsetting you. I know we’re entering an acceleration of technology at a time where our institutions globally are in an absolutely horrendous state. People on all sides are brainwashed as hell. The AI watchdogs are insane as well. What’s left but gallows humor? I do hold out some hope though.

          • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.worldEnglish
            31·
            9 months ago

            You cannot upset me more than the current common misunderstandings that everyone has about AI already does.

            I don’t think you understand the implications of undetectable AI to shift social conversation or the kind of world that those AI owners want to create.

            • Flumpkin@slrpnk.netEnglish
              12·
              9 months ago

              That might actually be the kind of thing where open source AI could help. At least I hope. To detect bias, lies or AI powered filtering / sorting of content.

              • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.worldEnglish
                83·
                9 months ago

                Ok so this is one of the naive thoughts that makes me upset.

                The open source community can’t even make a distro of linux that is out of the box functional for everyday users and you think somehow they are going to be able to outcompete billion dollar companies that can afford the best gear and devs?

                Look, I bought in heavy to open source early on in the 90s, and have done my best to go open source for every tool I can, but the simple fact is that even the ‘best’ open source projects are severely lacking in aspects and YOU CAN’T TRUST DEVELOPMENT OF AI TO THAT.

                Compare The Gimp to Photoshop. It isn’t even close, why? Because Adobe has a fucktonne of cash to throw at their projects and they have clear direction and motivation.

                I don’t like it

                I’d prefer a fully open source world

                But it isn’t going to happen, and open source AI will always lag behind corporate AI, and considering how fast it has been developing, even being 3 months behind renders a tool useless as an AI detector.

                We aren’t prepared for this and 90% of what everyone on the internet says about AI is poorly informed and full of confabulation, and WORST of all, when you try and explain this to them they get antagonistic.

                We have already seen the threat AI can pose in 2016 with Cambridge Analytica helping to hand trumpty dumpty the election by using AI to focus target vulnerable facebook groups.

                AND THAT AI WAS A FUCKING INFANT compared to what we have now.

                It’s going to be so bad and almost none of you have the slightest clue.

                • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish
                  1·
                  9 months ago

                  Honestly, most of what Cambridge analytica did was blackmail, illegal spending, and collusion between campaigns that were legally required to be separate.

                  Much of the data processing/ml was intended as a smoke screen to distract from the big stuff that was known to work and consequently legislated against. The problem is that they were so incompetent that the distraction technique was also illegal.

                  Maybe the machine learning also worked, but it’s really not clear.

                • Kedly@lemm.eeEnglish
                  21·
                  9 months ago

                  See, THIS is the criticism of AI I can actually empathize with, I might even agree with it somewhat

    • Turun@feddit.deEnglish
      21·
      9 months ago

      We already have AI in Firefox. And not gonna lie, offline (I.e. absolutely private) translations for webpages is pretty neat.

      • Link@rentadrunk.orgEnglish
        6·
        9 months ago

        It’s really good but I do wish it supported more languages like Russian or Japanese. So far most of the times I have had to translate a page, Firefox didn’t support the language.

        • Matriks404@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          9 months ago

          It’s really good but I do wish it supported more languages like Russian

          It’s never too late to learn the language of enemy!

        • bean@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          9 months ago

          This. It has held back adoption for me. I want translations in my language of choice and it’s simply not one of the very few options of languages available. AI could help with this.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
    542·
    9 months ago

    You were the Chosen One! It was said that you would destroy the Sith, not join them! Bring balance to the browsers, not leave it in darkness!

  • Deceptichum@kbin.social
    46·
    9 months ago

    Let me share some fun Mozilla facts about their previous CEO who has now stepped down to “executive chairwoman” last week.

    She received 6.9 million dollars in 2022 and 5 million in 2021, 3 million in 2020.

    Her replacement is an executive from AirBnB and eBay. We will find out how much both of these are earning in 2025 when they release their financial statements.

    They fired 60 staff and are adding AI to their flagship program to earn more money.

    Tell me this is a good thing.

    • spaduf@slrpnk.netEnglish
      121·
      9 months ago

      Tell me this is a good thing.

      Mozilla has long been the most ethical player in this space (while still producing SOTA ML). All of their datasets/models are open source and usually crowdsourced. Not to mention, their existing work is primarily in improving accessibility.

      ALSO, the other half of this story is that Firefox is becoming the primary focus again. Everybody’s freaking out about the AI stuff but that’s because they’re only reading the headlines. The programs they’ve shut down are things like Hubs (Mozilla’s metaverse platform), the VPN, and the sensitive data scrubber (which was using a third party service anyway).

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.worldEnglish
          31·
          9 months ago

          The Lunduke shit again? The one that takes offense to money being donated to support “politics” i.e abortion rights?

          Take a look at the other trash he posts on his reddit profile. That blog is not a trustworthy source, by any stretch, and it’s sweetly ignoring that he’s not looking at Mozilla’s spending alone, but of 3 separate entities that exist under the umbrella of the Mozilla Foundation.

          • aidan@lemmy.worldEnglish
            02·
            9 months ago

            I don’t know anything about him, but the criticism of them spending money on donating to other charities rather than focusing on making Mozilla’s core projects sustainable IMO is correct.

        • spaduf@slrpnk.netEnglish
          0·
          9 months ago

          I don’t think this is a money making move. The previous CEO was absolutely overly focused on monetization and this move is a step away from that. I should’ve addressed this more explicitly in the above comment but even for the players who actively monetize, AI is a money incinerator.

          • ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            2·
            9 months ago

            Cloud AI is, but for local AI, they only need to incinerate enough money to train it. That’s none if they just end up using mixtral or something

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      82·
      9 months ago

      Tell me this is a good thing.

      Ok. Mozilla was spreading itself too thin, spending resources trying to compete with multiple products against established brands that were already way ahead of them. They needed to focus down onto their core product rather than frivolously cast about.

      And AI is the technology of the future, despite all the whinging and griping by commenters on the subject. It’s being incorporated into the other major browsers, it’s a must-have if Firefox is to remain relevant. I’m sure you’ll be able to turn it off in the settings if you don’t want it and if you’re really concerned about getting AI cooties there’ll be niche forks that are compiled without it.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        9 months ago

        And AI is the technology of the future, despite all the whinging and griping by commenters on the subject.

        You have no idea, any more than the rest of us. Like, please tell me you understand “____ is the technology of the future” has been said more times than it’s ever been true.

        The idea of AI is a technology of the future, but what we have growing now is not AI, not really, and this iteration can be just as big a flop as any other technology of the moment.

        • 4am@lemm.eeEnglish
          0·
          9 months ago

          LLMs are what everyone dunks on, and “image generators are coming for our jobs! Think of artists! It’s not real art if a cheating machine does it!” is also a common cry.

          But do any of those people even know about the new class of antibiotics a neural network trained to find patterns in protein folding discovered? Do any of them know about the accuracy of diagnosis that IBM Watson was able to make in cases of rare cancers, even when doctors didn’t see it? What about changes in weather prediction accuracy? Novel suggestions in materials science?

          We are mimicking neural patterns, similar to the way our own minds work, to achieve pattern recognition and even extrapolate from them. And yeah, right now we’re brute forcing it, and we’re not even entirely sure how these relationships develop. It’s in its infancy, and growing fast.

          This is technology considered the holy grail of computing. We have been chasing this concept since the 1940s. There are a million sci-fi stories about it and there are a million more attempts to make it work before one really stuck.

          And now we’re at the beginning of it being practical and you think we’re just gonna go “eh it’s a wet fart like the Virtual Boy. Oh well, let’s make some new phones or something”?

          No. This is literally the technology of the future. Within your lifetime (assuming you live a reasonable while longer) there will come a point when you won’t be able to buy a CPU without some type of neural engine in it.

          And yes, people will (and already are) do horrific shit with it. It will fuck over a large portion of the white collar economy; a portion of which were told to go into the careers they did because they’d be safe from automation. “Get a degree and you’ll be safe!” they told us! Now they tell us “you better work at two different targets to make that payment, should have studied a trade!”

          So the reason for skepticism and animosity is almost certainly the fear of being replaced; but look at how far these AI models have come in the last month alone. We’re already in “this is changing the future” territory and those things are just getting started.

          • daltotron@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            9 months ago

            This is technology considered the holy grail of computing.

            This shit is just analog computing though, right? Like at it’s base, we’re just reproducing analog computation in a digital environment and then we’re framing that in a million different ways, like we’ve been doing since the seventies. We’ve actually had this shit since the first computers, which were analog. The whole reason we moved to digital, though, is because the results were easier to break down, parse, and we had control over every step of the process to confirm it was correct, and it was going to be correct every time. A clearer sense of limitations and constraints, basically.

            Now I’m not entirely against analog computing as a matter of fact, right, in fact I think it can be pretty cool if we recognize it for what it is, but at the same time I can’t help but think that the level of hype around it is fucking insane. Primarily because it’s not easily controllable or reproducible. Not in the sense that we’re gonna somehow invent a rogue AI that will kill us all, or whatever garbage, but in the sense that, while you can get easily reproducible results (such is the nature of computation), it is very hard to control what the output is of a given neural network. You can process loads of information extremely quickly, but, like, what use is that if I don’t know whether or not the solution is correct, or if it’s just a kind of ballpark figure? That’s the main issue.

            Again, fine if we recognize it, but I don’t think we’re really close at all to just like, randomly inventing a rogue consciousness. We’re not anywhere close to that, from what I’ve seen. We’re still barely good at image recognition and generation in an actually complicated environment, and even then it’s still pretty hard to get what it is that you specifically want, partially because the hype is driving so much development at this point, and the implementation is bunk and, again, kind of uncontrollable. Venture capital jumping down this thing’s throat has partially blocked it’s airway, as I see it. Still a useful technology, potentially, but a million stupid tech demos and image generators for nonsensical memes that we can flood everyone with is the dumbest shit imaginable, and even dumber than that is the level of venture capitalists I see that want to somehow monetize that.

            And so I have to ask, right, if I want a robot to sort through the different colors of little plastic beads, right, do I get a large language model on that, or do I just run a pretty basic and more efficient algorithm that just narrows the parameter of beads to a certain color, as recorded by the camera, and then that’s it? Do I want to translate a sentence with AI, or do I want to just manually run a straight word to word conversion that maybe changes based on a couple passes I’m gonna run at it to check whether or not it contextually makes sense with something like a markov chain? Trick question, they are both the same approach, AI has just done it in a way where I could apply a kind of broader paintbrush to the thing and get my results a little faster and with a little less thought even if I have less control over it.

          • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zipEnglish
            1·
            9 months ago

            Here’s one of the big issues: Basically all of the AI is not even happening on your CPU, it’s happening on the cloud.

            And that wouldn’t be in issue if companies stopped shoving “AI” into everything not originally built for AI.

            And even that wouldn’t be as big of an issue if the companies talked about the benefits of the new tech instead of just going “AI!!!1!!! drops mic”

      • Shadywack@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        9 months ago

        And AI is the technology of the future, despite all the whinging and griping by commenters on the subject.

        Yeah because we’ve never seen tech fads before heralded as the next big thing. If I could roll my eyes any harder we could harness that for power generation.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          1·
          9 months ago

          The tools I want to see integrated into Firefox already exist. I’ve used them. It’s just a matter of putting them together with it.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        41·
        9 months ago

        And the ever increasing CEO wages and hiring of AirBnB/eBay executive as CEO? Their previous CEOs salary alone could’ve covered everyone of those employees fired.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          9 months ago

          They didn’t hire the AirBnB/eBay executive to be CEO, they’ve been there for a while.

          Also, you understand that people can work for companies without supporting their agendas, right?

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          1·
          9 months ago

          That part’s not good. I was addressing the “They fired 60 staff and are adding AI to their flagship program to earn more money.” Part.

          • Deceptichum@kbin.social
            1·
            9 months ago

            I know, I was more looking at the bigger picture.

            Adding AI could be fine, but with the direction the leadership is going I can’t see it as good in this case.

      • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        I agree with you that Mozilla is spreading itself too thin. And don’t get me wrong, I love Firefox and am a long time user. But they do need to understand their user base better.

        They aren’t going to become a sustainable business by copying more popular browsers. It’s their differences from the mainstream that make them appealing as an alternative in the first place. I already don’t like them foisting Pocket on me, which 100% should have remained an extension. I don’t like the fact that Google is their default search engine, which goes against all their privacy messaging. I understand the reason is money, but that’s kind of the definition of being a sellout isn’t it? Their core values should always come first.

        Fact is, those employees weren’t fired for any good reason other than to hop on the latest tech trend. It’s this sort of corporate “profit before people” bullshit that will erode any goodwill that people still have towards Mozilla. I couldn’t give a fuck about adding a stupid AI driven chatbot to Mozilla, and neither, I imagine, do many of their current users. Honestly, I think “AI” has ruined the internet in a lot of ways already. It’s already had a massive negative impact on the quality of search results, across all major search engines, because of all the low quality llm content that has been produced already, and it’s only going to get worse. And you can’t trust a single thing that comes out of those models, so what is even the point of them?

        Sorry in advance for the old man rant lol.

          • Shadywack@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            9 months ago

            I think the obvious worry being alluded to is the reason they had 400m in cash due to their arrangement with Google. Their primary sustenance comes from an entity actively seeking their destruction.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.devEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        And AI is the technology of the future, despite all the whinging and griping by commenters on the subject.

        The entire discussion is to distract ourselves from the raw truth:

        Fax machines are the technology of the future.

        Fax machines will outlive us all. AI and VR will reach their heyday, then wane with years and be replaced. But whatever replaces them will sit quietly in the shadow of the everlasting Fax machine.

  • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.deEnglish
    402·
    9 months ago

    Things to add to your product when you want to look hip and trendy, but dont have any real ideas how to make your product better:

    • 1990s: visitor counter
    • 1995: Popups
    • 2000s: flash intros
    • 2005: stock photography
    • 2010: local weather widget
    • 2015: share to social media widgets
    • 2020: fullsize 4k background stock videos
    • 2024: AI assistant
      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zipEnglish
        51·
        9 months ago

        I’m not sure if you remember, but site rings were what you used instead of Google. They were useful.

        And I’ve seen some guest books with lots of people at some point in my childhood, but about half a year after that everybody firmly chose in favor of hierarchical boards.

        And I don’t share that hate for <marquee>, it served the purpose of showing you a long line in a small space, implicitly saying that it’s secondary temporary information, a bit like on TV.

        And what’s wrong with animated GIFs, animation is nice.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zipEnglish
      101·
      9 months ago

      visitor counter

      I actually liked those.

      flash intros

      These could be used to create right atmosphere.

      local weather widget

      Back then I hated those, but maybe showing local weather on desktop is not such a bad thing.

      share to social media widgets

      Hate. Hate. Hate.

    • neutron@thelemmy.clubEnglish
      7·
      9 months ago

      It really grinds my gears. Why does my bank insist on installing an app to approve transactions, and why does that app have a huge background video playing every time i open it? It really should consist of an MFA code generator.

    • lud@lemm.eeEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      And yet Microsoft added a weather (and bullshit) widget to windows in like 2020

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.itEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        I suppose many people were already using a third-party Aero widget for weather forecast since Windows 7.

        I know I did.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.worldEnglish
    402·
    9 months ago

    So to recap, your choices are

    1. One of 70 flavors of Chromium including the “privacy centric” Opera who run Chinese loan shark gangs for some reason, Edge which is Microsoft Chromium and aside from hardware acceleration capabilities is pretty meh, and Brave which despite operating their own separate search engine index are one of the most likely to sell your data and/or kidneys

    2. Rapidly Enshitifying Firefox

    3. Safari - no comment

    4. Whatever the fuck Gecko is…

    5. Tor Browser (for people with infinite time to wait for pages to load, or maybe just drug dealers)

    • theplanlessman@lemmy.worldEnglish
      92·
      9 months ago

      RE: point 1, I’m a fan of Vivaldi, a privacy-focused highly modified chromium build developed by former Opera developers who were disillusioned by the direction that company went in.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        Librewolf is built on Gecko, people often accredit it as a “firefox fork”.

        Tor Browser seems cool, it’s what I use on my phone whenever I have spare time to let it load before searching things which don’t require a lot of bandwidth. I’ll edit the above list.

        Mullvad? Is that some kind of slur? I’ve never heard of that but searches say it’s a VPN client. ¯\(ツ)/¯

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.eeEnglish
    393·
    9 months ago

    The paradox of tech right now “we are going to build the most complex technology known to man into our product in the next 12 months. Are we hiring record numbers of people to get it done? No. We fired a bunch of people and everyone else will just have to be extremely hardcore.”

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipEnglish
      11·
      9 months ago

      They’re refocusing on Firefox and continuing the ai stuff they were already doing. They fireded people who were working on fediverse and metaverse platforms. Did you even read the article?

        • veng@lemmy.worldEnglish
          811·
          9 months ago

          It’s literally a marketing term for a bunch of structured algorithms at this stage - not some sentient witchcraft

            • veng@lemmy.worldEnglish
              4·
              9 months ago

              I guess the point is that its complexity is overrated, but still definitely not ‘simple’.

            • Miaou@jlai.luEnglish
              11·
              9 months ago

              … It is simple, the idea exists since 40y ago, it’s just being done at scale

              Edit: make it 80 actually

        • Miaou@jlai.luEnglish
          1·
          9 months ago

          I bet I know much more on the topic than you, but please enlighten me on which part of this is complex?

          The core concepts of DNNs are taught in high-school, and putting them together can done by a Bachelor student. Shit, people often advise writing a NN libraries as a good learning exercise when picking up a new programming language.

          I think mathematically illiterate people assume that incredible results necessarily imply complexity, but that’s simply not the case here. Or the idea that unknown things are necessarily complex, maybe.

          The main reason DNNs are popping up is because we finally have the hardware for it. And the second reason is that tech companies have the resources (both financial and in terms of available data) to throw at it.

  • maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zoneEnglish
    32·
    9 months ago

    I hope the folks laid off land on their feet.

    I’m starting to think FF is being deliberately run into the ground by the higher ups. It would be good to hear from some of the devs about their thoughts on all this.

  • laughterlaughter@lemmy.worldEnglish
    21·
    9 months ago

    as Firefox is the only browser that can’t trace its lineage back to Apple and WebKit

    What a slap on Konqueror’s face.

      • laughterlaughter@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        That’s quite the bummer. But still. Saying that almost all browsers can trace their lineage to Apple and Webkit is technically correct, but it’s just a half-truth. As Apple and Webkit were once based on KHTML.

      • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        I mean yes no kinda Konqueror simply accepted a bunch of downstream patches, including a name change.

        …more or less. It could for a long time use all three of KHTML, WebKit (fork of KHTML) and QtWebEngine (Blink wrapped for Qt, that is, a fork of WebKit), they recently removed KHTML support because noone was updating it and it hadn’t been the default for ages.

        If they hadn’t implemented multi-engine support in the past they probably would’ve switched over to “whatever Qt provides” right-out, it’s KDE after all. Ultimately they’re providing a desktop, not a web browser. Back in the days they did decide to roll their own instead of going with Firefox but it was never a “throw project resources at it” kind of situation, there were simply KDE people who felt like working on it. Web standards were a lot less involved back around the turn of the millennium, and also new and shiny. Back in the days people thought that HTML 4.01 Strict and XHMTL would be a thing that servers actually would start to output instead of the usual tagsoup.

        If you’re that kind of person right now I’ll point you in the direction of Servo. No, Firefox doesn’t use it and it’s not a Mozilla project any more, Firefox only included (AFAIK) parallel CSS handling, the rest is still old Gecko.

    • nixcamic@lemmy.worldEnglish
      51·
      9 months ago

      I don’t really see it this way it’s just marketing. Saying “all other browsers descend from big bad corporate Apple” is scary, saying “all other browsers descend from another open source project” is meh.