To be clear: there’s a night-and-day difference between Biden and Trump, with the former having actually taking significant action, and being likely to take more if reelected. Trump will look to maximize both extraction and consumption of fossil fuels in a way that Biden simply didn’t and won’t.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Voting for the lesser of two evils can still be part of a strategy that acknowledges the inadequacy of mainstream political solutions. But it needs to be combined with other, more activist political activities.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don’t disagree but was responding to the use of the phrase “significant action”

      As well as “night and day” when it’s more like “midnight and sunset”

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I agree. The phrasing of this “largest in history” narrative depends strongly on the fact that the US has done almost nothing to address climate change historically. This should be thoughtfully criticized but I worry this will discourage people into thinking that nothing can be done.