This sounds like something Lemmy would also really benefit from.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    No, there is only a very basic option that implements maybe a third of what Pixelfed does now.

    • Elle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is there something more to it that’s not highlighted in the linked blog post?

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Did you read the entire blog post?

        Lemmy’s system gives no feedback to applicants at all and is a single input field that offers no guided onboarding what so ever. It’s not even a proof of concept compared to what the blog post describes for Pixelfed.

        • Elle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, however without experience with Lemmy’s implementation, it wasn’t clear what the differences were. From what I’ve read of Lemmy’s basic implementation, i.e. submit a reason with your registration/application, this didn’t sound that far from it.

          As I read it, Pixelfed’s request for more information form is a good addition (better than the awkward roundabout way you’d have to handle it otherwise, as I think I recall seeing come up with Lemmy), albeit as it’s optional we’ll have to see how well it’s used in practice.