Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • then_three_more@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sounds pretty cultural to me, something that’s persisted for a hundred and twenty years (What’s that a quarter of your country’s history?) based on an over religious ideal and pushed by a capitalist.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I consider “culture” to have a deeper meaning to a population, at least moreso than “my dick’s cut, so my kid’s gonna have a cut dick because I’m not aware of basic hygiene practices!”

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        “my dick’s cut, so my kid’s gonna have a cut dick

        Change the sex and genitalia in question, and this is basically what drives FGM. It’s mostly women who had it done to them that drive the practice forward. That’s how traditional practices work in general - you repeating what happened to you with your offspring, often long past the point where the original purpose (if any) has any value.