• meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you put “money in for decades” it would be almost impossible to only have enough for “two months rent” at this point. Either you’re not telling the whole story or you were literally robbed.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This still doesn’t explain the “only 2 months rent” part, but I’ve had friends who thought they were investing in a 401k but were seeing virtually no growth. Upon looking into it, they hadn’t allocated funds but were required to do so, so the money was sitting in a cash reserve pile earning the typical .02% interest.

      So, this could mean losing out on 30 years of gains if it were to go on long enough. But 30 years of deposits should still have been way more than 2 months rent so dunno what to say about that part