starman@programming.dev to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoPlease don't use Discord for FOSS projectsdrewdevault.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1209arrow-down10 cross-posted to: opensource@programming.devopensource@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansopensource@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1209arrow-down1external-linkPlease don't use Discord for FOSS projectsdrewdevault.comstarman@programming.dev to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilink cross-posted to: opensource@programming.devopensource@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansopensource@lemmy.ml
minus-squarenoddy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoIf it is possible to detect which posts are cross posts, it should be possible to create a client app that combines the threads. Maybe give you an option to chose which one to post your comment.
minus-squareKissaki@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are.
minus-squareDark Arc@social.packetloss.gglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoI think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments. You might not like the admins of example.org:foo but you might have no issues with the admins of example.com:foo.
If it is possible to detect which posts are cross posts, it should be possible to create a client app that combines the threads. Maybe give you an option to chose which one to post your comment.
I don’t think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are.
I think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments.
You might not like the admins of
example.org:foo
but you might have no issues with the admins ofexample.com:foo
.