• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    The fundamental difference is who is in control, and for what purpose.

    American spyware is controlled by corporations, and is all about selling you shit you don’t need.

    Chinese (and Russian) spyware is–apparently–controlled rather directly by their respective governments, and is being used to suppress democracy and increase polarization in the US and EU.

    I don’t like any spyware. But the latter category–spyware that’s functionally state-sponsored–is clearly more immediately dangerous. The former is more like a slow-growing cancer.

        • ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Glad to see the first comment in this chain being one calling out the usage of the Twitter files as a serious supporting point for anything but a point of deflection by Mr “I don’t use pr firms”.

          Immediately emptied out a salt shaker on how I viewed everything else in the original comment :| homie thinks the Twitter files are relevant… ehhh I probably don’t have much interest or respect in any of their other opinions

      • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s already loads of upvote/downvote bots in the fediverse here - would not be shocked if a large portion of them are from governments

          • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Id be surprised if all admins of every instance that’s federated with Lemmy are all on the same page, let alone looking for narrative driven bots.

            I see “Ukrainian combat footage” with hundreds of upvotes and no comments, there was also an article speaking positively about facebook that had lots of upvotes and no comments (it’s in my history of you look, because I commented lol) - those look like red flags to me

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I don’t find the first strange, but I also find combat footage both interesting and not worth commenting on. Plus I think a lot of people just upvote Ukraine stuff and move along because there’s no more conversation to be had in general.

              That second one does seem a little weird, but Lemmy’s more than capable of licking corporate boot when you phrase it correctly to them. I’ve always found that strange in general.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      So it’s only okay for them to suppress democracy and increase polarization if they use American platforms? Because that’s already happening.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not defending China here, but since Snowden we now know that American corporate spyware does serve the government. And they are suppressing democracy - this isn’t a democracy yet, and peaceful protests for democracy are met with violent police resistance - Occupy, BLM, etc.

      I sincerely hope that Lemmy can grow large enough to serve as a staging ground for democratic protests in America, just because it’s not corporate controlled.

    • Talaraine@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The former is more like a slow-growing cancer.

      One that we can actually fight, I might add, and we should.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Absolutely.

        I mean, that’s part of the reason that I’m here, rather than The Place That Shall Not Be Named. That, and because my account was permanently banned because I suggested torching the house of a someone flying a nazi flag.

    • Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would love to know how all the cat and cooking videos in my tiktok feed are being used to suppress democracy 🙄

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    My main reason is I’m an American, China (probably) can’t do shit to me. But here I’m subject to so much shit America can do legally and illegally, with zero repercussions.

    If China fucked me in particular over, odds are it would at least spark debate here. If America spied on my messages and stopped me from protesting something, that’s just a Tuesday afternoon here.

    The only reason why Congress wants to ban it, is due to pressure from news agencies and the government, because TikTok can’t be controlled by the CIA. You can’t manufacture consent of the people if the content comes from someone else you don’t control.

    https://www.npr.org/2024/03/13/1237501725/house-vote-tiktok-ban

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t punish overly aggressive police.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t make food or rent affordable.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t denounce Israel’s bullshit.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t cancel student loans.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t take Covid seriously.

  • tiredcapillary@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not big of a fan of Chinese surveillance but to most peoples point that have already posted here, if this was about privacy then the government should be passing laws to protect consumer privacy as a whole and not just targeting Chinese companies. Really shows that the government doesn’t give a shit about your privacy just who’s able to get it.

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      https://www.npr.org/2024/03/13/1237501725/house-vote-tiktok-ban

      Advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, have called the bill “censorship plain and simple,” arguing that “jeopardizing access to the platform jeopardizes access to free expression.”

      At 27 years old, Florida Democratic Rep. Maxwell Frost is the youngest member of Congress, and he opposes the bill.

      “I think that it is a violation of people’s First Amendment rights,” he said. “TikTok is a place for people to express ideas. I have many small businesses in my district and content creators in my district, and I think it’s going to drastically impact them too.”

      The fact that Republicans started it is enough for me to be at least suspicious of why its even being considered.

      EDIT: Also lol at “strong first amendment rights” when redneck states ban any books with queer or black characters. And lmao at “Strong first amendment rights” when people get fired for talking about forming a union, let alone even trying to make one.

  • peepee_longstonking@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The concern about TikTok acquiring your private information for marketing purposes is a red herring. The concern of our government here is propaganda and narrative control – power.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If I had a nickel for every time I saw one of these posts, I’d have two nickels, Which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice on the same day

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tankies failing to comprehend the fundamental difference between an actor who tries to make money off you and an actor trying to manufacture dissent and influence the public narrative

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Point taken, though it’s still an American company they could crack down upon if they prove too dangerous too.

        To be clear: I don’t want to get spied upon by anyone and I don’t use most of the American services for that reason. But obviously domestic bad actors are better than bad actors controlled by a foreign and hostile government

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It would be a lot better if Congress could pass a comprehensive privacy bill, but we lack a functioning government so I guess this is the best we can do.

          Greatest democracy in the world, right here.

        • trebuchet@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s crazy to me that people such as you unironically believe the position you’re saying that American companies are easier to crack down on.

          We are literally seeing concrete proof in action that domestic companies are much harder to crack down on or regulate. They are much better positioned to lobby and are currently using their immense political power to protect themselves while removing their foreign rivals. There isn’t even talk of taking action against them because they are so politically powerful.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            … it’s obvious because a domestic entity is subject to local laws, and can if push comes to shove be shut down or nationalized. A foreign one is essentially out of reach.

              • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                Why is it contentious that a government can better curb foreign interference if it is done on a domestic platform? Regardless of how shitty the United States are that’s a simple fact and also practiced by China, only to a much greater extent.

            • saga@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              The existence of the article you’re literally commenting on directly refutes what you’re saying here. Like you’re in a thread because of news that demonstrates that the opposite of what you’re saying here is actually true.

              If you need more examples - What happened to Facebook after the Cambridge Analytica scandal? They got banned by congress right? They got shut down? The government stopped them from continuing to manipulate the public?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      trying to manufacture dissent and influence the public narrative

      That shit is all over American social media too buddy. If that’s the issue it should all be banned.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Read the other comments, I don’t want to repeat myself for every idiot jumping on the dogpile. Why does every single China fan assume I love the United States and have a blind eye towards their bullshit? I’m not an American.