stupid republicans. they were convinced that by putting the squeeze on pornhub they could dictate how that site operates when
-
this isn’t the web 1.0 anymore. websites have been able to geoblock content for at least 20 years now
-
vpns exist. it’s not going to stop people in texas from still visiting the site, nor is it the only free streaming porn site and
-
unless a credit card or drivers license is required, age verification is easy to get around. “this content is restricted to adults 18 and over (21 in utah). by clicking yes you acknowledge that you are of legal age by penalty of perjury. are you 18? (yes) (no)”. I was on adult sites at 16.
this law proves these people have no goddamned clue how the internet works.
- Lads its only Texas
They’re used to being blocked by little desert theocracies around the world. Another one isn’t a big deal
- In addition to Texas, Pornhub has reluctantly blocked site access for people in other states with age-verification laws including Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Utah and Virginia.
Ref: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/03/14/porn-texas-shut-down/72976270007/
What the fucks an Arkansas
What the fucks an Arkansas
- Capital City: Little Rock
- Population: 3.068 million people
- Area: 53180 square miles
- GSP: $166 billion per year
- Unemployment Rate: 3.4%
- Median Home Sale Price: $120560.
- 4.1. people in red states don’t matter.
- 4.2. Democrats in red states deserve it for being outnumbered.
Yes
3 isn’t even true. Any child capable of reading has the ability to input their parents info, meaning a bypass for this stupid law is in every single home across the country that has an adult in it.
-
I suspect that the next step was going to be to require PH et al to turn over usage metrics along with the identities of the people using the platform.
This would give them a very good idea of how many texans are LGBTQ, or into interacial… or whatever else they don’t like.
They won’t do that. It increases the risk of finding out how many Republican representatives watch gay and incest porn.
watching is fine. Making it… well it’s not really gay if the dicks don’t touch, right?
Even if they do touch, you can tip your hat and say “pardon me sir” in a 10 second window after the incident to cancel it out.
Additionally, you can come in prepared by saying “No homo” which protects you during the whole act.
Even better, they could sit on that info until someone steps out of line or is in their way, then leak it to erode their support.
deleted by creator
Why? So they out everyone to their angry mob; so they can harass, assault and murder them?
That data shouldn’t even exist,
Fuck Paxton
I was so happy when the texas republican party turned on him and were going to charge him with all kinds of corruption. Then the shitheads double thought and remembered that corruption is just what republicans do… no charges…
deleted by creator
Might want to check if this guy has stock in Nord VPN
Nah, just appreciates basic access to the internet.
Here have a gun kiddo but don’t you look at some balls unless you’re of age
I can confirm the authenticity.
Thousands of texans just yelled YEeee awwww schucks
As a Texan, I find this funny and authorize the upvotes.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Texas residents who visit the site are met with a message from the company that criticizes the state’s elected officials who are requiring them to track the age of users.
The company said the newly passed law impinges on “the rights of adults to access protected speech” and fails to pass strict scrutiny by “employing the least effective and yet also most restrictive means of accomplishing Texas’s stated purpose of allegedly protecting minors.”
“Attempting to mandate age verification without any means to enforce at scale gives platforms the choice to comply or not, leaving thousands of platforms open and accessible,” the message said, adding that “very few sites are able to compare the robust Trust and Safety measures we currently have in place.”
“Until the real solution is offered, we have made the difficult decision to completely disable access to our website in Texas,” the company said, first reported by the Houston Chronicle.
Paxton released a statement on March 8, calling the ruling an “important victory.” The court ruled that the age verification requirement does not violate the First Amendment, Paxton said, saying he won in the fight against Pornhub and other pornography companies.
The law asks users to provide government-issued identification or public or private data to verify they are of age to access the site.
The original article contains 398 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 46%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
How about getting parents to do their job when it comes to monitoring their child’s internet content? There are enough parental control tools out there.
yes they so, they ask nicely lol
