• HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    not really. reagan over carter. bush over gore, bush over heart, trump over hilary. We went with the worst option plenty. Problem is we are a democracy and not everyone views the best option is the same. Many of those races were extremely close when the worse option won (hanging chads). Sure we would not be perfect but if those races had went the other way because of the best worst option having more support it we would be way better off today and its possible the worst worst option would find it had to be a bit better which might have pushed the best worst to be a bit better to. What has happened is the worst worst finds they can just be worse and worse because that just turns off folks from seeking better and buy into the, they are all the same, fud.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The dems though are the people who vote in the primary and work with their local chapters. Anyone can improve the canidate pool. The dems win some times though while the non dem liberals have never defeated a republican canidate. They just bitch about the innefective job the dems do while not getting the job done themselves.

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Even on the local level, Democrats will attack you and shun you if you don’t share their specific neolib agenda. I tried a couple times to get involved but if they find out you’re too progressive they’ll freak tf out about how they need people “serious about making change” or whatever and start pushing you out.

            Like bro I just wanted to help make copies or wtfever you do here but OK I’ll go home lol