I see people talking about doas saying it’s just like sudo but with less features. I’m just wondering if there is any situation where you should use doas or if it’s just personal preference.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      The concern is not storage space, but potential bugs leading to security issues. For OpenBSD this is very important, and so they made doas.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I understand the concern - but it’s not warranted. LOC is a bad predictor of security. And fwiw /usr/bin/sudo on my system is only 227K.

        The OpenBSD team does fantastic work. I’m assuming doas will be a good tool and probably more secure that sudo generally. But “size” isn’t the best way to determine that. It’s not even a good way.

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Tedu (author of doas) wrote about it in 2015:
          “There were some concerns that sudo was too big, running too much code in a privileged process. And there was also pressure to enable even more options, because the feature set shipped in base wasn’t big enough. (As shipped in OpenBSD, the compiled sudo was already five times larger than just about any other setuid program.)”
          https://flak.tedunangst.com/post/doas