Especially in recent years, Google’s efforts in the smart home have received continued criticism, but looking at the current state of the Google Home app and Nest hardware, is that still deserved?
…
That’s basically where I stand at this point. Google Nest is full of shortcomings, absolutely, but it’s also one of the only simple smart home camera offerings out there that isn’t bogged down by awful software, higher fees, or complicated setup/maintenence. I’ve been vocal about my issues with Nest over the past few years, but I’m overall reasonably satisfied, and I don’t hesitate to tell folks who ask about home cameras to give Nest their consideration.
Should Nest still work to improve? Absolutely.
There’s so much room to improve, as the very vocal community of users made clear during this week’s AMA. I, for one, hope Google’s team read each and every one of those comments and took them to heart. But, like many of those users, I’ve also been burned by Google on the smart home. I still hate that feature parity isn’t a thing in the Home app (without some ridiculously complex workarounds). I’m still frustrated at poorly thought through choices on newer Nest Cams. I’m still trying to find a good security system to replace my Nest Secure that’s dying for no good reason.
But every time I look elsewhere, I have the same thought: is it really so bad?
I’m in the planning stages of my setup and anything that doesn’t support zwave is right off the list (zigby and enocean can be considered though). If it’s not processed locally, it’s a no go.
Granted, it takes a fair bit more planning. And I expect that some stuff possibly won’t work without a bit of tweaking (or possibly at all, there’s going to be an awful lot of new things at once).